netdev - Re: [Security] TIPC security issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101027.102940.112580564.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	drosenberg@...curity.com, jon.maloy@...csson.com,
	allan.stephens@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	security@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [Security] TIPC security issues

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:31:12 -0700

> Something like the appended UNTESTED patch. NOTE! it actually makes
> "verify_iovec()" *change* the iovec if it grows too big.

Ok I thought a bit about this patch.

How we can behave here depends upon the socket type.

For example, for a stream socket such as TCP a partial write is OK and
we could truncate the iovec like this.  That's fine.

But for a datagram socket, we have to have a one-to-one correspondance
between write() calls and packets on the wire.  So we'd either need to
accept the entire write() length or fail it with an error.

verify_iovec() (currently) doesn't have the socket type information
available, so it's not able to key off of that right now.

I agree that cutting off these cases at a high level would be the
thing to do long term, but right now verify_iovec() isn't positioned
such that we can do it just yet.

For now I'm going to look into specifically fixing the TIPC case and
also think longer term about another way to address this at a high
level.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html