[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F169D4F5E1F1974DBFAFABF47F60C10AA5E60671@orsmsx507.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:34:34 -0700
From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: "jgarzik@...hat.com" <jgarzik@...hat.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: ethtool: missing implementation of n_priv_flags
Was just looking at implementing the driver private flags to add a new feature to
a driver.
It appears that nothing in the core ethtool.c ever accesses or prints n_priv_flags,
even if a driver assigns it (which none in the kernel currently do)
Is this just an oversight?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists