netdev - Re: NULL pointer dereference at netxen_nic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101029.125403.71123384.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dkirjanov@...nel.org
Cc:	bjorn.helgaas@...com, amit.salecha@...gic.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference at netxen_nic_probe+0x813/0x9a0

From: Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@...nel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:47:22 +0400

>> This is on current Linus upstream as of this morning (8128057)
>> on an HP DL785:
>> 
>> QLogic/NetXen Network Driver v4.0.74
>> netxen_nic 0000:07:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 30 (level, low) -> IRQ 30
>> netxen_nic 0000:07:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
>> netxen_nic 0000:07:00.0: 2MB memory map
>> netxen_nic 0000:07:00.0: loading firmware from flash
>> netxen_nic 0000:07:00.0: using 64-bit dma mask
>> kernel: Quad Gig LP Board S/N TI9ABK0266  Chip rev 0x42
>> netxen_nic 0000:07:00.0: firmware v4.0.520 [legacy]
>> netxen_nic 0000:07:00.0: irq 72 for MSI/MSI-X
>> netxen_nic 0000:07:00.0: irq 73 for MSI/MSI-X
>> netxen_nic 0000:07:00.0: irq 74 for MSI/MSI-X
>> netxen_nic 0000:07:00.0: irq 75 for MSI/MSI-X
>> netxen_nic 0000:07:00.0: using msi-x interrupts
>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
>> IP: [<ffffffff8160afda>] netxen_nic_probe+0x813/0x9a0
>> PGD 0
>> Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
>> last sysfs file:
>> CPU 0
>> Modules linked in:
>> 
>> Pid: 1650, comm: work_for_cpu Not tainted 2.6.36-07338-g8128057 #269
>> /ProLiant DL785 G5
>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8160afda>]  [<ffffffff8160afda>]
>> netxen_nic_probe+0x813/0x9a0
>> RSP: 0018:ffff8806138abe30  EFLAGS: 00010246
>> RAX: 0000000000000010 RBX: ffff8806139126c0 RCX: 0000000000000000
>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff880613895616 RDI: ffff880613912000
>> RBP: ffff8806138abe90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8806138abb80
>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880613912000
>> R13: ffff8812174f7000 R14: ffff880613912000 R15: ffff8812174f7000
>> FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8800cfa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>> CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000001c07000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> Process work_for_cpu (pid: 1650, threadinfo ffff8806138aa000, task
>> ffff880616f12be0)
>> Stack:
>>  ffff8812174f7090 0000000000000246 ffff8806138abe90 ffff8812174f7000
>>  00008806138abfd8 0000000000000282 68cd0025b30068cc ffff880c17439d30
>>  ffff8812174f7090 ffff8812174f7000 ffff8812174f7208 0000000000000000
>> Call Trace:
>>  [<ffffffff81203696>] local_pci_probe+0x48/0x91
>>  [<ffffffff81052bae>] ? do_work_for_cpu+0x0/0x26
>>  [<ffffffff81052bc1>] do_work_for_cpu+0x13/0x26
>>  [<ffffffff81052bae>] ? do_work_for_cpu+0x0/0x26
>>  [<ffffffff81057a7b>] kthread+0x81/0x89
>>  [<ffffffff81003854>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>>  [<ffffffff810579fa>] ? kthread+0x0/0x89
>>  [<ffffffff81003850>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
>> Code: 00 eb 15 49 8d bf 90 00 00 00 48 c7 c6 1b 2e aa 81 31 c0 e8 c0
>> 4e cd ff 4c 89 f7 e8 d6 bb ee ff 49 8b 96 00 03 00 00 48 8d 42 10 <f0>
>> 80 4a 10 01 4c 89 f7 e8 a3 7e ed ff 85 c0 41 89 c4 74 2a 49
>> RIP  [<ffffffff8160afda>] netxen_nic_probe+0x813/0x9a0
>>  RSP <ffff8806138abe30>
>> CR2: 0000000000000010
>> ---[ end trace 059c7071bbf8de1f ]---
> Could you please try the following patch.  

Why do you need to touch the queue state at all in the probing code?

Until the first ->open() occurs, the queue state is "don't care."

The netif_carrier_off() call is fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html