netdev - Re: [PATCH 05/15] dec netdev: relocate DIGITAL based drivers to legacy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101028.224703.112589527.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	macro@...ux-mips.org
Cc:	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] dec netdev: relocate DIGITAL based drivers to
 legacy

From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 05:54:56 +0100 (BST)

>  Hmm, what's the difference between placing these drivers here or there 
> and what's so particular about them that they cause clutter?  I mean a 
> mere high number of items does not cause a mess by itself -- the lack of 
> order might.
> 
>  Also -- if this change goes ahead -- when I add new TURBOchannel drivers, 
> should they go straight to legacy/?  It sounds odd to me to have a thing 
> obsolete straight from the beginning.

This patch series started with a "0/15" introduction posting which
explains the intention and reasoning.

It might be easier for you to read it instead of asking me to repeat
it's contents :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html