[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101028.225326.183057622.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: macro@...ux-mips.org
Cc: paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] dec netdev: relocate DIGITAL based drivers to
legacy
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:46:13 +0100 (BST)
> This would be no different to what we do wrt network protocols under
> net/, so drivers would go to ethernet/, fasteth/, gbeth/, 10gbeth/, fddi/,
> tokenring/, atm/, appletalk/, etc. (names up to debate if need be) as
> applicable. This would scale well, avoid the need for arbitrary decisions
> (is this piece legacy yet or not?) and automatically classify drivers as
> more or less obsolescent too, as obviously none of the stuff under
> ethernet/, fddi/ or tokenring/ can be reasonably recent unlike 10gbeth/.
Why are you so hung up about something being called legacy?
I would be proud to be labelled "legacy", as that means I've served a
purpose for a long time and some folks even want or need me to stick
around for a bit longer.
Legacy hardware is just old and the drivers for them are in a purely
"sustaining" state, that is all.
And using link layer technology to classify is really stupid since
many devices match multiple of the categories you've suggested.
I think the existing proposal is just fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists