[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101029080347.GA22688@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:03:47 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] vhost: TX used buffer guest signal accumulation
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:32:35PM -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 07:20 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > My concern is this can delay signalling for unlimited time.
> > Could you pls test this with guests that do not have
> > 2b5bbe3b8bee8b38bdc27dd9c0270829b6eb7eeb
> > b0c39dbdc204006ef3558a66716ff09797619778
> > that is 2.6.31 and older?
>
> The patch only induces delay signaling unlimited time when there is no
> TX packet to transmit. I thought TX signaling only noticing guest to
> release the used buffers, anything else beside this?
Right, that's it I think. For newer kernels we orphan the skb
on xmit so we don't care that much about completing them.
This does rely on an undocumented assumption about guest
behaviour though.
> I tested rhel5u5 guest (2.6.18 kernel), it works fine. I checked the two
> commits log, I don't think this patch could cause any issue w/o these
> two patches.
>
> Also I found a big TX regression for old guest and new guest. For old
> guest, I am able to get almost 11Gb/s for 2K message size, but for the
> new guest kernel, I can only get 3.5 Gb/s with the patch and same host.
> I will dig it why.
>
> thanks
> Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists