lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=zieMoDdHgB_aY4xN=A6ErrjUWpaME1WwWrvnL@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:01:19 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	jon.maloy@...csson.com, allan.stephens@...driver.com,
	Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Limit socket I/O iovec total length to INT_MAX.

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> I don't see anything obviously broken (and we obviously have allowed
> iov_len == 0 cases all along, so if anything, breakage won't be new).
> However, I wonder if things like sendmsg() for datagrams have warranties
> against silent truncation.  Davem?

You missed that discussion - my argument is that anybody who thinks
that they can send a single packet that is 2GB+ in size are already
screwed. And the packet protocol will have some inherent upper limit
anyway (possibly introduced by just allocation issues, but quite
likely inherent to the protocol itself)

And yes, the iov_len = 0 case has always been possible and accepted so
my patch doesn't really change anything. In fact, I think it even
happens (simple example: the easiest way for user space to resume a
partial writev() is to basically subtract out the return value from
the iovec and then re-submit it - so getting zero iovec entries at the
beginning in particular would not necessarily even be odd)

                            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ