[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288449350.2680.970.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:35:50 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: core: sock: fix information leak to userland
Le samedi 30 octobre 2010 à 18:26 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov a écrit :
> "Address" variable might be not fully initialized in sock->ops->get_name().
> The only current implementation is get_name(), it leaves some padding
> fields of sockaddr_tipc uninitialized. It leads to leaking of contents
> of kernel stack memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>
> ---
> Compile tested.
>
> net/core/sock.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 3eed542..759dd81 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
> {
> char address[128];
>
> + memset(&address, 0, sizeof(address));
> if (sock->ops->getname(sock, (struct sockaddr *)address, &lv, 2))
> return -ENOTCONN;
> if (lv < len)
???
Please fix the real bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists