lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 05:53:42 +0100 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: bonding: flow control regression [was Re: bridging: flow control regression] Le mardi 02 novembre 2010 à 11:06 +0900, Simon Horman a écrit : > Thanks for the explanation. > I'm not entirely sure how much of a problem this is in practice. Maybe for virtual devices (tunnels, bonding, ...), it would make sense to delay the orphaning up to the real device. But if the socket send buffer is very large, it would defeat the flow control any way... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists