[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101102005952.GB15848@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 01:59:52 +0100
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...c.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Rasesh Mody <rmody@...cade.com>,
Debashis Dutt <ddutt@...cade.com>,
Kristoffer Glembo <kristoffer@...sler.com>,
linux-driver@...gic.com, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Ethtool: convert get_sg/set_sg calls to
hw_features flag
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:15:50PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 06:28 +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -1088,7 +1076,19 @@ static int __ethtool_set_sg(struct net_device *dev, u32 data)
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> > }
> > - return dev->ethtool_ops->set_sg(dev, data);
> > +
> > + if (dev->ethtool_ops->hw_set_sg) {
> > + err = dev->ethtool_ops->hw_set_sg(dev, data);
> > + if (err)
> > + return min(err, 0);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (data)
> > + dev->features |= NETIF_F_SG;
> > + else
> > + dev->features &= ~NETIF_F_SG;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
> [...]
>
> The odd semantics of positive return values really need to be documented
> - both in the commit message and in the comment on struct ethtool_ops.
Will do.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists