netdev - Re: [PATCH 46/49] net/netfilter: Use vzalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:25:34 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
	coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/49] net/netfilter: Use vzalloc

On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 11:10 -0400, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Joe Perches wrote:
> > I also think a single rolled-up single patch is good.
> > I believe Jiri Kosina can easily apply all these individual patches as a 
> > single patch if he chooses.
> I will, after this settles a little bit (the same for the WARN series). 
> I prefer waiting a bit before applying your patches usually. 
> First to see what lands in linux-next through maintainer's trees, second 
> to gather Acks.

I think that's the right way to do these
sorts of trivial changes too.

Individual patches cc'd to maintainers for
feedback, improvement, acks or to be directly
applied to their trees, followed by a longish
delay before any unapplied patches are taken
up as a single patch by your trivial queue.

Thanks for doing that work Jiri.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html