netdev - Re: [Security] [SECURITY] Fix leaking of kernel heap addresses via /proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	drosenberg@...curity.com, chas@....nrl.navy.mil,
	kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net,
	remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	security@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [Security] [SECURITY] Fix leaking of kernel heap addresses via
 /proc

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:50:32 -0700

> On Saturday, November 6, 2010, Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com> wrote:
>>
>> Clearly, in most cases we cannot just remove the field from the /proc
>> output, as this would break a number of userspace programs that rely on
>> consistency.  However, I propose that we replace the address with a "0"
>> rather than leaking this information.
> 
> I really think it would be much better to use the unidentified number
> or similar.
> 
> Just replacing with zeroes is annoying, and has the potential of
> losing actual information.

I would really like to see the specific examples of where this is
happening, it sounds like something very silly to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html