[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1011081104310.1687@ja.ssi.bg>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:36:21 +0200 (EET)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
cc: lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] ipvs: allow transmit of GRO aggregated skbs
Hello,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Simon Horman wrote:
> [ CCing Herbet Xu ]
>
>>>> This is a first attempt at allowing LVS to transmit
>>>> skbs of greater than MTU length that have been aggregated by GRO.
>>>>
>>>> I have lightly tested the ip_vs_dr_xmit() portion of this patch and
>>>> although it seems to work I am unsure that netif_needs_gso() is the correct
>>>> test to use.
>>>
>>> ip_forward() uses !skb_is_gso(skb), so may be it is
>>> enough to check for GRO instead of using netif_needs_gso?
>>
>> Thanks, I'll look into that.
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> just to clarify, you think that !skb_is_gso(skb) should be
> used in ip_vs_xmit.c? If so, yes I think that makes sense
> and I'll re-spin my patch accordingly.
Yes, I think we should check for !skb_is_gso(skb)
as it looks as correct check to avoid FRAG_NEEDED after GRO
but lets wait for confirmation from Herbert Xu.
Also, !skb->local_df check should help for local IPVS clients
that set local_df.
If you prefer you can create such helper in ip_vs_xmit.c:
/* Check if packet exceeds MTU */
static inline int ip_vs_mtu_exceeded(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int mtu)
{
return skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb) && !skb->local_df;
}
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists