| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <00fe01cb8009$62e11410$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:26:50 +0900
From: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
To: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "Wolfgang Grandegger" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Wolfram Sang" <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
"Christian Pellegrin" <chripell@...e.org>,
"Barry Song" <21cnbao@...il.com>,
"Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
<socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com>, <qi.wang@...el.com>,
<margie.foster@...el.com>, <yong.y.wang@...el.com>,
"Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>,
<kok.howg.ewe@...el.com>, <joel.clark@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] can: Topcliff: PCH_CAN driver: Fix build warnings
Sorry, for late response.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
To: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] can: Topcliff: PCH_CAN driver: Fix build warnings
> On 11/02/2010 11:27 AM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 30, 2010 1:23 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >
> >>> The driver has already been merged. Please send incremental patches
> >>> against david's net-2.6 branch.
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >> Here a review, find comments inline. Lets talk about my remarks, please
> >> answer inline and don't delete the code.
> >>
> >> Can you please explain me your locking sheme? If I understand the
> >> documenation correctly the two message interfaces can be used mutual.
> >> And you use one for rx the other one for tx.
> >
> > I show our locking scheme.
> > When CPU accesses MessageRAM via IF1, CPU protect until read-modify-write
> > so that IF2 access not occurred, vice versa.
>
> Why is that needed?
For MessageRAM data consistency.
>
> >
> >>
> >> Please use netdev_<level> instead of dev_<level> for debug.
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,1436 @@
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Copyright (C) 1999 - 2010 Intel Corporation.
> >>> + * Copyright (C) 2010 OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> >>> + * the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> >>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> >>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> >>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> >>> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> >>> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
> >>> + */
> >>> +
> >>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/io.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/init.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/types.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/netdevice.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/skbuff.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/can.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/can/dev.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/can/error.h>
> >>> +
> >>> +#define MAX_MSG_OBJ 32
> >>> +#define MSG_OBJ_RX 0 /* The receive message object flag. */
> >>> +#define MSG_OBJ_TX 1 /* The transmit message object flag. */
> >>> +
> >>> +#define CAN_CTRL_INIT 0x0001 /* The INIT bit of CANCONT register. */
> >>> +#define CAN_CTRL_IE 0x0002 /* The IE bit of CAN control register */
> >>> +#define CAN_CTRL_IE_SIE_EIE 0x000e
> >>> +#define CAN_CTRL_CCE 0x0040
> >>> +#define CAN_CTRL_OPT 0x0080 /* The OPT bit of CANCONT register. */
> >>> +#define CAN_OPT_SILENT 0x0008 /* The Silent bit of CANOPT reg. */
> >>> +#define CAN_OPT_LBACK 0x0010 /* The LoopBack bit of CANOPT reg. */
> >>> +#define CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_SET 0x00f3
> >>> +#define CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET 0x0073
> >>> +#define CAN_CMASK_ALL 0xff
> >>> +#define CAN_CMASK_RDWR 0x80
> >>> +#define CAN_CMASK_ARB 0x20
> >>> +#define CAN_CMASK_CTRL 0x10
> >>> +#define CAN_CMASK_MASK 0x40
> >>> +#define CAN_CMASK_NEWDAT 0x04
> >>> +#define CAN_CMASK_CLRINTPND 0x08
> >>> +
> >>> +#define CAN_IF_MCONT_NEWDAT 0x8000
> >>> +#define CAN_IF_MCONT_INTPND 0x2000
> >>> +#define CAN_IF_MCONT_UMASK 0x1000
> >>> +#define CAN_IF_MCONT_TXIE 0x0800
> >>> +#define CAN_IF_MCONT_RXIE 0x0400
> >>> +#define CAN_IF_MCONT_RMTEN 0x0200
> >>> +#define CAN_IF_MCONT_TXRQXT 0x0100
> >>> +#define CAN_IF_MCONT_EOB 0x0080
> >>> +#define CAN_IF_MCONT_DLC 0x000f
> >>> +#define CAN_IF_MCONT_MSGLOST 0x4000
> >>> +#define CAN_MASK2_MDIR_MXTD 0xc000
> >>> +#define CAN_ID2_DIR 0x2000
> >>> +#define CAN_ID_MSGVAL 0x8000
> >>> +
> >>> +#define CAN_STATUS_INT 0x8000
> >>> +#define CAN_IF_CREQ_BUSY 0x8000
> >>> +#define CAN_ID2_XTD 0x4000
> >>> +
> >>> +#define CAN_REC 0x00007f00
> >>> +#define CAN_TEC 0x000000ff
> >>
> >> A prefix for like PCH_ instead of CAN_ for all those define above would
> >> be fine to avoid namespace clashes and/or confusion with the defines from the socketcan framework.
> >>
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>> +
> >>> +#define PCH_RX_OK 0x00000010
> >>> +#define PCH_TX_OK 0x00000008
> >>> +#define PCH_BUS_OFF 0x00000080
> >>> +#define PCH_EWARN 0x00000040
> >>> +#define PCH_EPASSIV 0x00000020
> >>> +#define PCH_LEC0 0x00000001
> >>> +#define PCH_LEC1 0x00000002
> >>> +#define PCH_LEC2 0x00000004
> >>
> >> These are just single set bit, please use BIT()
> >> Consider adding the name of the corresponding register to the define's
> >> name.
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> +#define PCH_LEC_ALL (PCH_LEC0 | PCH_LEC1 | PCH_LEC2)
> >>> +#define PCH_STUF_ERR PCH_LEC0
> >>> +#define PCH_FORM_ERR PCH_LEC1
> >>> +#define PCH_ACK_ERR (PCH_LEC0 | PCH_LEC1)
> >>> +#define PCH_BIT1_ERR PCH_LEC2
> >>> +#define PCH_BIT0_ERR (PCH_LEC0 | PCH_LEC2)
> >>> +#define PCH_CRC_ERR (PCH_LEC1 | PCH_LEC2)
> >>> +
> >>> +/* bit position of certain controller bits. */
> >>> +#define BIT_BITT_BRP 0
> >>> +#define BIT_BITT_SJW 6
> >>> +#define BIT_BITT_TSEG1 8
> >>> +#define BIT_BITT_TSEG2 12
> >>> +#define BIT_IF1_MCONT_RXIE 10
> >>> +#define BIT_IF2_MCONT_TXIE 11
> >>> +#define BIT_BRPE_BRPE 6
> >>> +#define BIT_ES_TXERRCNT 0
> >>> +#define BIT_ES_RXERRCNT 8
> >>
> >> these are usually called SHIFT
> >
> > I agree. Is the below TRUE ?
> > e.g.#define PCH_SHIFT_BITT_BRP 0
>
> I would put the SHIFT at the end, YMMV
>
> #define PCH_BIT_BRP_SHIFT
I agree.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> +#define MSK_BITT_BRP 0x3f
> >>> +#define MSK_BITT_SJW 0xc0
> >>> +#define MSK_BITT_TSEG1 0xf00
> >>> +#define MSK_BITT_TSEG2 0x7000
> >>> +#define MSK_BRPE_BRPE 0x3c0
> >>> +#define MSK_BRPE_GET 0x0f
> >>> +#define MSK_CTRL_IE_SIE_EIE 0x07
> >>> +#define MSK_MCONT_TXIE 0x08
> >>> +#define MSK_MCONT_RXIE 0x10
> >>
> >> MSK or MASK is okay, however the last two are just single bits.
> >>
> >> Please add a PCH_ prefix here, too.
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> +#define PCH_CAN_NO_TX_BUFF 1
> >>> +#define COUNTER_LIMIT 10
> >>
> >> dito
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +#define PCH_CAN_CLK 50000000 /* 50MHz */
> >>> +
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Define the number of message object.
> >>> + * PCH CAN communications are done via Message RAM.
> >>> + * The Message RAM consists of 32 message objects.
> >>> + */
> >>> +#define PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM 26 /* 1~ PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM is Rx*/
> >>> +#define PCH_TX_OBJ_NUM 6 /* PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM is RX ~ Tx*/
> >>> +#define PCH_OBJ_NUM (PCH_TX_OBJ_NUM + PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM)
> >>
> >> You define MAX_MSG_OBJ earlier, seems like two names for the same value.
> >
> > In case, a use uses all message objects(=32), you are right.
> > But user does not alway use all message object.
>
> No one will change these values if the driver isn't buggy. And it
> doesn't make any sense to not use all objects.
I see.
I will delete PCH_OBJ_NUM or MAX_MSG_OBJ.
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +#define PCH_FIFO_THRESH 16
> >>> +
> >>> +enum pch_can_mode {
> >>> + PCH_CAN_ENABLE,
> >>> + PCH_CAN_DISABLE,
> >>> + PCH_CAN_ALL,
> >>> + PCH_CAN_NONE,
> >>> + PCH_CAN_STOP,
> >>> + PCH_CAN_RUN,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +struct pch_can_regs {
> >>> + u32 cont;
> >>> + u32 stat;
> >>> + u32 errc;
> >>> + u32 bitt;
> >>> + u32 intr;
> >>> + u32 opt;
> >>> + u32 brpe;
> >>> + u32 reserve1;
> >>
> >> VVVV
> >>> + u32 if1_creq;
> >>> + u32 if1_cmask;
> >>> + u32 if1_mask1;
> >>> + u32 if1_mask2;
> >>> + u32 if1_id1;
> >>> + u32 if1_id2;
> >>> + u32 if1_mcont;
> >>> + u32 if1_dataa1;
> >>> + u32 if1_dataa2;
> >>> + u32 if1_datab1;
> >>> + u32 if1_datab2;
> >> ^^^^
> >>
> >> these registers and....
> >>
> >>> + u32 reserve2;
> >>> + u32 reserve3[12];
> >>
> >> ...and these
> >>
> >> VVVV
> >>> + u32 if2_creq;
> >>> + u32 if2_cmask;
> >>> + u32 if2_mask1;
> >>> + u32 if2_mask2;
> >>> + u32 if2_id1;
> >>> + u32 if2_id2;
> >>> + u32 if2_mcont;
> >>> + u32 if2_dataa1;
> >>> + u32 if2_dataa2;
> >>> + u32 if2_datab1;
> >>> + u32 if2_datab2;
> >>
> >> ^^^^
> >>
> >> ...are identical. I suggest to make a struct defining a complete
> >> "Message Interface Register Set". If you include the correct number of
> >> reserved bytes in the struct, you can have an array of two of these
> >> structs in the struct pch_can_regs.
> >
> > To me, IMHOHO, it looks insignificant point.
> > Please show the merit ?
>
> See Wolfgangs comments. You can get rid of duplicated code....
Using this method, I can't image to be able to reduce code size, now.
However I will try it.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> + u32 reserve4;
> >>> + u32 reserve5[20];
> >>> + u32 treq1;
> >>> + u32 treq2;
> >>> + u32 reserve6[2];
> >>> + u32 reserve7[56];
> >>> + u32 reserve8[3];
> >>> + u32 srst;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +struct pch_can_priv {
> >>> + struct can_priv can;
> >>> + struct pci_dev *dev;
> >>> + unsigned int tx_enable[MAX_MSG_OBJ];
> >>> + unsigned int rx_enable[MAX_MSG_OBJ];
> >>> + unsigned int rx_link[MAX_MSG_OBJ];
> >>> + unsigned int int_enables;
> >>> + unsigned int int_stat;
> >>> + struct net_device *ndev;
> >>> + spinlock_t msgif_reg_lock; /* Message Interface Registers Access Lock*/
> >> ^^^
> >> please add a whitespace
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> + unsigned int msg_obj[MAX_MSG_OBJ];
> >>> + struct pch_can_regs __iomem *regs;
> >>> + struct napi_struct napi;
> >>> + unsigned int tx_obj; /* Point next Tx Obj index */
> >>> + unsigned int use_msi;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static struct can_bittiming_const pch_can_bittiming_const = {
> >>> + .name = "pch_can",
> >>> + .tseg1_min = 1,
> >>> + .tseg1_max = 16,
> >>> + .tseg2_min = 1,
> >>> + .tseg2_max = 8,
> >>> + .sjw_max = 4,
> >>> + .brp_min = 1,
> >>> + .brp_max = 1024, /* 6bit + extended 4bit */
> >>> + .brp_inc = 1,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(pch_pci_tbl) = {
> >>> + {PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x8818, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,},
> >>> + {0,}
> >>> +};
> >>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, pch_pci_tbl);
> >>> +
> >>> +static inline void pch_can_bit_set(u32 *addr, u32 mask)
> >> ^^^^^
> >>
> >> that should be an void __iomem *, see mail I've send the other day.
> >> Please use sparse to check for this kinds of errors.
> >> (Compile the driver with C=2, i.e.: make drivers/net/can/pch_can.ko C=2)
> >>
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>> +{
> >>> + iowrite32(ioread32(addr) | mask, addr);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static inline void pch_can_bit_clear(u32 *addr, u32 mask)
> >> ^^^^^
> >>
> >> dito
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> +{
> >>> + iowrite32(ioread32(addr) & ~mask, addr);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_set_run_mode(struct pch_can_priv *priv,
> >>> + enum pch_can_mode mode)
> >>> +{
> >>> + switch (mode) {
> >>> + case PCH_CAN_RUN:
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->cont, CAN_CTRL_INIT);
> >>> + break;
> >>> +
> >>> + case PCH_CAN_STOP:
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->cont, CAN_CTRL_INIT);
> >>> + break;
> >>> +
> >>> + default:
> >>> + dev_err(&priv->ndev->dev, "%s -> Invalid Mode.\n", __func__);
> >>> + break;
> >>> + }
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_set_optmode(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + u32 reg_val = ioread32(&priv->regs->opt);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY)
> >>> + reg_val |= CAN_OPT_SILENT;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_LOOPBACK)
> >>> + reg_val |= CAN_OPT_LBACK;
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->cont, CAN_CTRL_OPT);
> >>> + iowrite32(reg_val, &priv->regs->opt);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>
> >> IMHO the function name is missleading, if I understand the code
> >> correctly, this functions triggers the transmission of the message.
> >> After this it checks for busy,
> >
> > Yes, your understanding is TRUE.
> >
> >> but
> >>
> >>> +static void pch_can_check_if_busy(u32 __iomem *creq_addr, u32 num)
> >> ^^^^
> >>
> >
> > Yes, me too.
> > I will rename the function name.
> >
> > How about "pch_can_rw_msg_obj"
> >
> >> that should probaby be a void
> > What't the above mean ?
> > pch_can_check_if_busy is already "void" function.
>
> >>> +static void pch_can_check_if_busy(u32 __iomem *creq_addr, u32 num)
> >> ^^^^
>
> That u32 should be a void.
I agree.
>
> BTW: Does the Intel chip support x64? If so, have you tested the driver
> on a 64 bit kernel.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> +{
> >>> + u32 counter = COUNTER_LIMIT;
> >>> + u32 ifx_creq;
> >>> +
> >>> + iowrite32(num, creq_addr);
> >>> + while (counter) {
> >>> + ifx_creq = ioread32(creq_addr) & CAN_IF_CREQ_BUSY;
> >>> + if (!ifx_creq)
> >>> + break;
> >>> + counter--;
> >>> + udelay(1);
> >>> + }
> >>> + if (!counter)
> >>> + pr_err("%s:IF1 BUSY Flag is set forever.\n", __func__);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_set_int_enables(struct pch_can_priv *priv,
> >>> + enum pch_can_mode interrupt_no)
> >>> +{
> >>> + switch (interrupt_no) {
> >>> + case PCH_CAN_ENABLE:
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->cont, CAN_CTRL_IE);
> >>
> >> noone uses this case.
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> + break;
> >>> +
> >>> + case PCH_CAN_DISABLE:
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->cont, CAN_CTRL_IE);
> >>> + break;
> >>> +
> >>> + case PCH_CAN_ALL:
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->cont, CAN_CTRL_IE_SIE_EIE);
> >>> + break;
> >>> +
> >>> + case PCH_CAN_NONE:
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->cont, CAN_CTRL_IE_SIE_EIE);
> >>> + break;
> >>> +
> >>> + default:
> >>> + dev_err(&priv->ndev->dev, "Invalid interrupt number.\n");
> >>> + break;
> >>> + }
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_set_rx_enable(struct pch_can_priv *priv, u32 buff_num,
> >>> + int set)
> >>> +{
> >>> + unsigned long flags;
> >>> +
> >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + /* Reading the receive buffer data from RAM to Interface1 registers */
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET, &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, buff_num);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Setting the IF1MASK1 register to access MsgVal and RxIE bits */
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RDWR | CAN_CMASK_ARB | CAN_CMASK_CTRL,
> >>> + &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (set == 1) {
> >>> + /* Setting the MsgVal and RxIE bits */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if1_mcont, CAN_IF_MCONT_RXIE);
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if1_id2, CAN_ID_MSGVAL);
> >>> +
> >>> + } else if (set == 0) {
> >>> + /* Resetting the MsgVal and RxIE bits */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if1_mcont, CAN_IF_MCONT_RXIE);
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if1_id2, CAN_ID_MSGVAL);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, buff_num);
> >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_rx_enable_all(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int i;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Traversing to obtain the object configured as receivers. */
> >>> + for (i = 1; i <= PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM; i++)
> >>> + pch_can_set_rx_enable(priv, i, 1);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_rx_disable_all(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int i;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Traversing to obtain the object configured as receivers. */
> >>> + for (i = 1; i <= PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM; i++)
> >>> + pch_can_set_rx_enable(priv, i, 0);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_set_tx_enable(struct pch_can_priv *priv, u32 buff_num,
> >>> + u32 set)
> >>> +{
> >>> + unsigned long flags;
> >>> +
> >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + /* Reading the Msg buffer from Message RAM to Interface2 registers. */
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET, &priv->regs->if2_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if2_creq, buff_num);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Setting the IF2CMASK register for accessing the
> >>> + MsgVal and TxIE bits */
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RDWR | CAN_CMASK_ARB | CAN_CMASK_CTRL,
> >>> + &priv->regs->if2_cmask);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (set == 1) {
> >>> + /* Setting the MsgVal and TxIE bits */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if2_mcont, CAN_IF_MCONT_TXIE);
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if2_id2, CAN_ID_MSGVAL);
> >>> + } else if (set == 0) {
> >>> + /* Resetting the MsgVal and TxIE bits. */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if2_mcont, CAN_IF_MCONT_TXIE);
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if2_id2, CAN_ID_MSGVAL);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if2_creq, buff_num);
> >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_tx_enable_all(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int i;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Traversing to obtain the object configured as transmit object. */
> >>> + for (i = PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM + 1; i <= PCH_OBJ_NUM; i++)
> >>> + pch_can_set_tx_enable(priv, i, 1);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_tx_disable_all(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int i;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Traversing to obtain the object configured as transmit object. */
> >>> + for (i = PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM + 1; i <= PCH_OBJ_NUM; i++)
> >>> + pch_can_set_tx_enable(priv, i, 0);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int pch_can_int_pending(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >> ^^^
> >>
> >> make it u32 as it returns a register value, or a u16 as you only use
> >> the 16 lower bits.
> >
> > I agree. I will modify to u32.
> >
> >>
> >>> +{
> >>> + return ioread32(&priv->regs->intr) & 0xffff;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_clear_buffers(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int i; /* Msg Obj ID (1~32) */
> >>> +
> >>> + for (i = 1; i <= PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM; i++) {
> >>
> >> IMHO the readability would be improved if you define something like
> >> PCH_RX_OBJ_START and PCH_RX_OBJ_END.
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_SET, &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> + iowrite32(0xffff, &priv->regs->if1_mask1);
> >>> + iowrite32(0xffff, &priv->regs->if1_mask2);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if1_id1);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if1_id2);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if1_mcont);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if1_dataa1);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if1_dataa2);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if1_datab1);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if1_datab2);
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RDWR | CAN_CMASK_MASK |
> >>> + CAN_CMASK_ARB | CAN_CMASK_CTRL,
> >>> + &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, i);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + for (i = PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM + 1; i <= PCH_OBJ_NUM; i++) {
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> dito for TX objects
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_SET, &priv->regs->if2_cmask);
> >>> + iowrite32(0xffff, &priv->regs->if2_mask1);
> >>> + iowrite32(0xffff, &priv->regs->if2_mask2);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if2_id1);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if2_id2);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if2_mcont);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if2_dataa1);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if2_dataa2);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if2_datab1);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if2_datab2);
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RDWR | CAN_CMASK_MASK | CAN_CMASK_ARB |
> >>> + CAN_CMASK_CTRL, &priv->regs->if2_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if2_creq, i);
> >>> + }
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_config_rx_tx_buffers(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int i;
> >>> + unsigned long flags;
> >>> +
> >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> +
> >>> + for (i = 1; i <= PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM; i++) {
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET, &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, i);
> >>
> >> If I understand the code correctly, the about function triggers a
> >> transfer. Why do you first trigger a transfer, then set the message contents....
> >
> > For doing Read-Modify-Write.
> > As to fixed parameter of message object, it doesn't be modified every access.
>
> I see.
>
> > We will modify to write only.
> >
> >>> +
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if1_id1);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if1_id2);
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if1_mcont, CAN_IF_MCONT_UMASK);
> >>
> >> Why do you set the "Use acceptance mask" bit? We want to receive
> >> all can messages.
> >
> > Without "Use acceptance mask" means received packet matched ID[28:0] only.
> > As a result, filter is enabled.
> >
> > With "Use acceptance mask" and setting Msk[0:28]=all 1, all packets can be received(=No filter state)
>
> Thanks for the explenation.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Set FIFO mode set to 0 except last Rx Obj*/
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if1_mcont, CAN_IF_MCONT_EOB);
> >>> + /* In case FIFO mode, Last EoB of Rx Obj must be 1 */
> >>> + if (i == (PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM - 1))
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if1_mcont,
> >>> + CAN_IF_MCONT_EOB);
> >>
> >> Make it if () { } else { }, please.
> >
> > Sorry, I can't understand.
> > else {} is not necessary.
>
> Please look at the code block above, again. You frist clean the bit
> unconditionally, then you set the bit in the if. Please make it:
>
> if (last)
> set_bit
> else
> clear_bit
I understand.
I will modify like above.
Thanks.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + iowrite32(0, &priv->regs->if1_mask1);
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if1_mask2,
> >>> + 0x1fff | CAN_MASK2_MDIR_MXTD);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Setting CMASK for writing */
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RDWR | CAN_CMASK_MASK | CAN_CMASK_ARB |
> >>> + CAN_CMASK_CTRL, &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, i);
> >>
> >> ...and then trigger the transfer again?
> >
> > This means Read-Modify-Write.
>
> ic
>
> >
> >>
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + for (i = PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM + 1; i <= PCH_OBJ_NUM; i++) {
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET, &priv->regs->if2_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if2_creq, i);
> >>
> >> same question about triggering the transfer 2 times applied here, too
> >
> > ditto.
> >
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Resetting DIR bit for reception */
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if2_id1);
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if2_id2);
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if2_id2, CAN_ID2_DIR);
> >>
> >> Can you combine the two accesses to >if2_id2 into one?
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Setting EOB bit for transmitter */
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_IF_MCONT_EOB, &priv->regs->if2_mcont);
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if2_mcont,
> >>> + CAN_IF_MCONT_UMASK);
> >>
> >> dito for if2_mcont
> >
> > ditto.
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + iowrite32(0, &priv->regs->if2_mask1);
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if2_mask2, 0x1fff);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Setting CMASK for writing */
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RDWR | CAN_CMASK_MASK | CAN_CMASK_ARB |
> >>> + CAN_CMASK_CTRL, &priv->regs->if2_cmask);
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if2_creq, i);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_init(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + /* Stopping the Can device. */
> >>> + pch_can_set_run_mode(priv, PCH_CAN_STOP);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Clearing all the message object buffers. */
> >>> + pch_can_clear_buffers(priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Configuring the respective message object as either rx/tx object. */
> >>> + pch_can_config_rx_tx_buffers(priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Enabling the interrupts. */
> >>> + pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_ALL);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_release(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + /* Stooping the CAN device. */
> >>> + pch_can_set_run_mode(priv, PCH_CAN_STOP);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Disabling the interrupts. */
> >>> + pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_NONE);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Disabling all the receive object. */
> >>> + pch_can_rx_disable_all(priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Disabling all the transmit object. */
> >>> + pch_can_tx_disable_all(priv);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/* This function clears interrupt(s) from the CAN device. */
> >>> +static void pch_can_int_clr(struct pch_can_priv *priv, u32 mask)
> >>> +{
> >>> + if (mask == CAN_STATUS_INT) {
> >>
> >> is this a valid case?
> >
> > This "if" is always false.
> > I will delete this condition.
> >
> >>
> >>> + ioread32(&priv->regs->stat);
> >>> + return;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Clear interrupt for transmit object */
> >>> + if ((mask >= 1) && (mask <= PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM)) {
> >>> + /* Setting CMASK for clearing the reception interrupts. */
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RDWR | CAN_CMASK_CTRL | CAN_CMASK_ARB,
> >>> + &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Clearing the Dir bit. */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if1_id2, CAN_ID2_DIR);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Clearing NewDat & IntPnd */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if1_mcont,
> >>> + CAN_IF_MCONT_NEWDAT | CAN_IF_MCONT_INTPND);
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, mask);
> >>> + } else if ((mask > PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM) && (mask <= PCH_OBJ_NUM)) {
> >>> + /* Setting CMASK for clearing interrupts for
> >>> + frame transmission. */
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * this is the prefered style of multi line comments,
> >> * please adjust you comments
> >> */
> >
> > I understand.
> >
> >>
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RDWR | CAN_CMASK_CTRL | CAN_CMASK_ARB,
> >>> + &priv->regs->if2_cmask);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Resetting the ID registers. */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if2_id2,
> >>> + CAN_ID2_DIR | (0x7ff << 2));
> >>> + iowrite32(0x0, &priv->regs->if2_id1);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Claring NewDat, TxRqst & IntPnd */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if2_mcont,
> >>> + CAN_IF_MCONT_NEWDAT | CAN_IF_MCONT_INTPND |
> >>> + CAN_IF_MCONT_TXRQXT);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if2_creq, mask);
> >>> + }
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static u32 pch_can_get_buffer_status(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return (ioread32(&priv->regs->treq1) & 0xffff) |
> >>> + ((ioread32(&priv->regs->treq2) & 0xffff) << 16);
> >>
> >> the second 0xffff is not needed, as the return value is u32 and you shift by 16.
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_reset(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + /* write to sw reset register */
> >>> + iowrite32(1, &priv->regs->srst);
> >>> + iowrite32(0, &priv->regs->srst);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_error(struct net_device *ndev, u32 status)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> + struct can_frame *cf;
> >>> + u32 errc;
> >>> + struct net_device_stats *stats = &(priv->ndev->stats);
> >>> + enum can_state state = priv->can.state;
> >>> +
> >>> + skb = alloc_can_err_skb(ndev, &cf);
> >>> + if (!skb)
> >>> + return;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (status & PCH_BUS_OFF) {
> >>> + pch_can_tx_disable_all(priv);
> >>> + pch_can_rx_disable_all(priv);
> >>> + state = CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF;
> >>> + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_BUSOFF;
> >>> + can_bus_off(ndev);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Warning interrupt. */
> >>> + if (status & PCH_EWARN) {
> >>> + state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING;
> >>> + priv->can.can_stats.error_warning++;
> >>> + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
> >>> + errc = ioread32(&priv->regs->errc);
> >>> + if (((errc & CAN_REC) >> 8) > 96)
> >>> + cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_WARNING;
> >>> + if ((errc & CAN_TEC) > 96)
> >>> + cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING;
> >>> + dev_warn(&ndev->dev,
> >>> + "%s -> Error Counter is more than 96.\n", __func__);
> >>
> >> Please use just "debug" level not warning here. Consider to use
> >> netdev_dbg() instead. IMHO the __func__ can be dropped and the
> >> "official" name for the error is "Error Warning".
> >
> > I want to know the reason.
> > Why is it not dev_warn but netdev_dbg ?
>
> If you use warning level it would end up on the console or and in the
> syslog. It's quite complicated (for programs) to get information from
> there. This is why we send CAN error frames. They hold the same
> information but int a binary form, thus it's easier to process.
I understand the reason.
BTW, Why do you say not dev_dbg but netdev_dbg ?
>
> >
> >>
> >>> + }
> >>> + /* Error passive interrupt. */
> >>> + if (status & PCH_EPASSIV) {
> >>> + priv->can.can_stats.error_passive++;
> >>> + state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE;
> >>> + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
> >>> + errc = ioread32(&priv->regs->errc);
> >>> + if (((errc & CAN_REC) >> 8) > 127)
> >>> + cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_PASSIVE;
> >>> + if ((errc & CAN_TEC) > 127)
> >>> + cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE;
> >>> + dev_err(&ndev->dev,
> >>> + "%s -> CAN controller is ERROR PASSIVE .\n", __func__);
> >>
> >> dito
> >
> > ditto
> >
> >>
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + if (status & PCH_LEC_ALL) {
> >>> + priv->can.can_stats.bus_error++;
> >>> + stats->rx_errors++;
> >>> + switch (status & PCH_LEC_ALL) {
> >>
> >> I suggest to convert to a if-bit-set because there might be more than
> >> one bit set.
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> + case PCH_STUF_ERR:
> >>> + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_STUFF;
> >>> + break;
> >>> + case PCH_FORM_ERR:
> >>> + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_FORM;
> >>> + break;
> >>> + case PCH_ACK_ERR:
> >>> + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_ACK |
> >>> + CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_ACK_DEL;
> >>> + break;
> >>> + case PCH_BIT1_ERR:
> >>> + case PCH_BIT0_ERR:
> >>> + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT;
> >>> + break;
> >>> + case PCH_CRC_ERR:
> >>> + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_SEQ |
> >>> + CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_DEL;
> >>> + break;
> >>> + default:
> >>> + iowrite32(status | PCH_LEC_ALL, &priv->regs->stat);
> >>> + break;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + priv->can.state = state;
> >>> + netif_receive_skb(skb);
> >>> +
> >>> + stats->rx_packets++;
> >>> + stats->rx_bytes += cf->can_dlc;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static irqreturn_t pch_can_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct net_device *ndev = (struct net_device *)dev_id;
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_NONE);
> >>> + napi_schedule(&priv->napi);
> >>> +
> >>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_fifo_thresh(struct pch_can_priv *priv, int obj_id)
> >>> +{
> >>> + if (obj_id < PCH_FIFO_THRESH) {
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RDWR | CAN_CMASK_CTRL |
> >>> + CAN_CMASK_ARB, &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Clearing the Dir bit. */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if1_id2, CAN_ID2_DIR);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Clearing NewDat & IntPnd */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if1_mcont,
> >>> + CAN_IF_MCONT_INTPND);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, obj_id);
> >>> + } else if (obj_id > PCH_FIFO_THRESH) {
> >>> + pch_can_int_clr(priv, obj_id);
> >>> + } else if (obj_id == PCH_FIFO_THRESH) {
> >>> + int cnt;
> >>> + for (cnt = 0; cnt < PCH_FIFO_THRESH; cnt++)
> >>> + pch_can_int_clr(priv, cnt+1);
> >>> + }
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int pch_can_rx_msg_lost(struct net_device *ndev, int obj_id)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> + struct net_device_stats *stats = &(priv->ndev->stats);
> >>> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> >>> + struct can_frame *cf;
> >>> +
> >>> + dev_err(&priv->ndev->dev, "Msg Obj is overwritten.\n");
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if1_mcont,
> >>> + CAN_IF_MCONT_MSGLOST);
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RDWR | CAN_CMASK_CTRL,
> >>> + &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, obj_id);
> >>> +
> >>> + skb = alloc_can_err_skb(ndev, &cf);
> >>> + if (!skb)
> >>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>> +
> >>> + priv->can.can_stats.error_passive++;
> >>> + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE;
> >>> + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
> >>> + cf->data[1] = CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_OVERFLOW;
> >>> + stats->rx_over_errors++;
> >>> + stats->rx_errors++;
> >>> +
> >>> + netif_receive_skb(skb);
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int pch_can_rx_normal(struct net_device *ndev, u32 obj_num, int quota)
> >>> +{
> >>> + u32 reg;
> >>> + canid_t id;
> >>> + u32 ide;
> >>> + u32 rtr;
> >>> + int rcv_pkts = 0;
> >>> + int rtn;
> >>> + int next_flag = 0;
> >>> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> >>> + struct can_frame *cf;
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> + struct net_device_stats *stats = &(priv->ndev->stats);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Reading the messsage object from the Message RAM */
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET, &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, obj_num);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Reading the MCONT register. */
> >>> + reg = ioread32(&priv->regs->if1_mcont);
> >>> + reg &= 0xffff;
> >>> +
> >>> + for (; (!(reg & CAN_IF_MCONT_EOB)) && (quota > 0);
> >>> + obj_num++, next_flag = 0) {
> >>> + /* If MsgLost bit set. */
> >>> + if (reg & CAN_IF_MCONT_MSGLOST) {
> >>> + rtn = pch_can_rx_msg_lost(ndev, obj_num);
> >>> + if (!rtn)
> >>> + return rtn;
> >>> + rcv_pkts++;
> >>> + quota--;
> >>> + next_flag = 1;
> >>> + } else if (!(reg & CAN_IF_MCONT_NEWDAT))
> >>> + next_flag = 1;
> >>> +
> >>
> >> after rearanging the code (see below..) you should be able to use a continue here.
> >>
> >>> + if (!next_flag) {
> >>> + skb = alloc_can_skb(priv->ndev, &cf);
> >>> + if (!skb)
> >>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Get Received data */
> >>> + ide = ((ioread32(&priv->regs->if1_id2)) & CAN_ID2_XTD);
> >>> + if (ide) {
> >>> + id = (ioread32(&priv->regs->if1_id1) & 0xffff);
> >>> + id |= (((ioread32(&priv->regs->if1_id2)) &
> >>> + 0x1fff) << 16);
> >>> + cf->can_id = (id & CAN_EFF_MASK) | CAN_EFF_FLAG;
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>
> >> is the mask needed, you mask the if1_id{1,2} already
> >
> > I will delete
> >
> >>
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + id = (((ioread32(&priv->regs->if1_id2)) &
> >>> + (CAN_SFF_MASK << 2)) >> 2);
> >>> + cf->can_id = (id & CAN_SFF_MASK);
> >>
> >> one mask can go away
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + rtr = ioread32(&priv->regs->if1_id2) & CAN_ID2_DIR;
> >> ^^
> >>
> >> remove one space
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + if (rtr)
> >>> + cf->can_id |= CAN_RTR_FLAG;
> >>> +
> >>> + cf->can_dlc = get_can_dlc((ioread32(&priv->regs->
> >>> + if1_mcont)) & 0xF);
> >>> + *(u16 *)(cf->data + 0) = ioread16(&priv->regs->
> >>> + if1_dataa1);
> >>> + *(u16 *)(cf->data + 2) = ioread16(&priv->regs->
> >>> + if1_dataa2);
> >>> + *(u16 *)(cf->data + 4) = ioread16(&priv->regs->
> >>> + if1_datab1);
> >>> + *(u16 *)(cf->data + 6) = ioread16(&priv->regs->
> >>> + if1_datab2);
> >>
> >> are you sure, the bytes in the can package a in the correct order.
> >> Please test your pch_can against a non pch_can system.
> >
> > Unfortunately, we don't have non pch_can system.
>
> Have a look a the driver/net/can/usb subdir and buy one of those. It
> really hard to find bugs if you test against your own driver.
We can't buy this right now for few budget.
But I heard we have "CANalyzer".
Using this, we can test this endian concern.
But we may need much time for studying how to use.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + netif_receive_skb(skb);
> >>> + rcv_pkts++;
> >>> + stats->rx_packets++;
> >>> + quota--;
> >>> + stats->rx_bytes += cf->can_dlc;
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_fifo_thresh(priv, obj_num);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Reading the messsage object from the Message RAM */
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET, &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, obj_num + 1);
> >>> + reg = ioread32(&priv->regs->if1_mcont);
> >>
> >> this is almost the same code as before the the loop, can you rearange
> >> the code to avoid duplication?
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return rcv_pkts;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_tx_complete(struct net_device *ndev, u32 int_stat)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> + struct net_device_stats *stats = &(priv->ndev->stats);
> >>> + unsigned long flags;
> >>> + u32 dlc;
> >>> +
> >>> + can_get_echo_skb(ndev, int_stat - PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM - 1);
> >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET | CAN_CMASK_CLRINTPND,
> >>> + &priv->regs->if2_cmask);
> >>> + dlc = ioread32(&priv->regs->if2_mcont) & CAN_IF_MCONT_DLC;
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if2_creq, int_stat);
> >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + if (dlc > 8)
> >>> + dlc = 8;
> >>
> >> use get_can_dlc
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> + stats->tx_bytes += dlc;
> >>> + stats->tx_packets++;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int pch_can_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct net_device *ndev = napi->dev;
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> + u32 int_stat;
> >>> + int rcv_pkts = 0;
> >>> + u32 reg_stat;
> >>> + unsigned long flags;
> >>> +
> >>> + int_stat = pch_can_int_pending(priv);
> >>> + if (!int_stat)
> >>> + goto END;
> >>> +
> >>> + if ((int_stat == CAN_STATUS_INT) && (quota > 0)) {
> >>> + reg_stat = ioread32(&priv->regs->stat);
> >>> + if (reg_stat & (PCH_BUS_OFF | PCH_LEC_ALL)) {
> >>> + if ((reg_stat & PCH_LEC_ALL) != PCH_LEC_ALL) {
> >>> + pch_can_error(ndev, reg_stat);
> >>> + quota--;
> >>> + }
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + if (reg_stat & PCH_TX_OK) {
> >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET, &priv->regs->if2_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if2_creq,
> >>> + ioread32(&priv->regs->intr));
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>
> >> Isn't this "int_stat". Might it be possilbe that regs->intr changes
> >> between the pch_can_int_pending and here?
> >
> > This code was mistake.
> > This condition, message object is not acccessed.
> > Thus, pch_can_check_if_busy can be deleted.
> >
> >>
> >> What should this transfer do?
> >>
> >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->stat, PCH_TX_OK);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + if (reg_stat & PCH_RX_OK)
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->stat, PCH_RX_OK);
> >>> +
> >>> + int_stat = pch_can_int_pending(priv);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + if (quota == 0)
> >>> + goto END;
> >>> +
> >>> + if ((int_stat >= 1) && (int_stat <= PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM)) {
> >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + rcv_pkts += pch_can_rx_normal(ndev, int_stat, quota);
> >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + quota -= rcv_pkts;
> >>> + if (rcv_pkts < 0)
> >>
> >> how can this happen?
> >
> > My mistake.
> > if (quota < 0) is TRUE.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>> + goto END;
> >>> + } else if ((int_stat > PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM) && (int_stat <= PCH_OBJ_NUM)) {
> >>> + /* Handle transmission interrupt */
> >>> + pch_can_tx_complete(ndev, int_stat);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> +END:
> >>> + napi_complete(napi);
> >>> + pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_ALL);
> >>> +
> >>> + return rcv_pkts;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int pch_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> + const struct can_bittiming *bt = &priv->can.bittiming;
> >>> + u32 canbit;
> >>> + u32 bepe;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Setting the CCE bit for accessing the Can Timing register. */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->cont, CAN_CTRL_CCE);
> >>> +
> >>> + canbit = (bt->brp - 1) & MSK_BITT_BRP;
> >>> + canbit |= (bt->sjw - 1) << BIT_BITT_SJW;
> >>> + canbit |= (bt->phase_seg1 + bt->prop_seg - 1) << BIT_BITT_TSEG1;
> >>> + canbit |= (bt->phase_seg2 - 1) << BIT_BITT_TSEG2;
> >>> + bepe = ((bt->brp - 1) & MSK_BRPE_BRPE) >> BIT_BRPE_BRPE;
> >>> + iowrite32(canbit, &priv->regs->bitt);
> >>> + iowrite32(bepe, &priv->regs->brpe);
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->cont, CAN_CTRL_CCE);
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_start(struct net_device *ndev)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (priv->can.state != CAN_STATE_STOPPED)
> >>> + pch_can_reset(priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_set_bittiming(ndev);
> >>> + pch_can_set_optmode(priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_tx_enable_all(priv);
> >>> + pch_can_rx_enable_all(priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Setting the CAN to run mode. */
> >>> + pch_can_set_run_mode(priv, PCH_CAN_RUN);
> >>> +
> >>> + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
> >>> +
> >>> + return;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int pch_can_do_set_mode(struct net_device *ndev, enum can_mode mode)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int ret = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + switch (mode) {
> >>> + case CAN_MODE_START:
> >>> + pch_can_start(ndev);
> >>> + netif_wake_queue(ndev);
> >>> + break;
> >>> + default:
> >>> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>> + break;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int pch_can_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> + int retval;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Regsitering the interrupt. */
> >>> + retval = request_irq(priv->dev->irq, pch_can_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED,
> >>> + ndev->name, ndev);
> >>> + if (retval) {
> >>> + dev_err(&ndev->dev, "request_irq failed.\n");
> >>> + goto req_irq_err;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Open common can device */
> >>> + retval = open_candev(ndev);
> >>> + if (retval) {
> >>> + dev_err(ndev->dev.parent, "open_candev() failed %d\n", retval);
> >>> + goto err_open_candev;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_init(priv);
> >>> + pch_can_start(ndev);
> >>> + napi_enable(&priv->napi);
> >>> + netif_start_queue(ndev);
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +
> >>> +err_open_candev:
> >>> + free_irq(priv->dev->irq, ndev);
> >>> +req_irq_err:
> >>> + pch_can_release(priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + return retval;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int pch_close(struct net_device *ndev)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> +
> >>> + netif_stop_queue(ndev);
> >>> + napi_disable(&priv->napi);
> >>> + pch_can_release(priv);
> >>> + free_irq(priv->dev->irq, ndev);
> >>> + close_candev(ndev);
> >>> + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_STOPPED;
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static netdev_tx_t pch_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
> >>> +{
> >>> + unsigned long flags;
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> + struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
> >>> + int tx_buffer_avail = 0;
> >>
> >> What I'm totally missing is the TX flow controll. Your driver has to
> >> ensure that the package leave the controller in the order that come
> >> into the xmit function. Further you have to stop your xmit queue if
> >> you're out of tx objects and reenable if you have a object free.
> >>
> >> Use netif_stop_queue() and netif_wake_queue() for this.
> >
> > In this code, I think "out of tx objects" cannot be occurred.
>
> It's not a matter of code it's the hardware. You cannot put more than a
> certain number of CAN frames into the hardware. If you have a CAN bus at
> a certain speed, you can only send a certain number of CAN frames in a
> second. So you cannot push more than this amount of frames/s into the
> hardware.
>
> > Nevertheless, are netif_stop_queue() and netif_wake_queue() is necessary ?
>
> Yes.
I can' understand your issue.
Please can you hear my opinion?
Please see the head of pch_xmit.
> > + if (priv->tx_obj == (PCH_OBJ_NUM + 1)) { /* Point tail Obj + 1 */
> > + while (ioread32(&priv->regs->treq2) & 0xfc00)
> > + udelay(1);
When points tail of Tx message object,
this driver waits until completion of all tx messaeg objects.
Thus, application/driver ought not to be able to put Tx object exceed the number of tx message object.
Thus I think these code(netif_stop_queue/netif_wake_queue) are completely redundant.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + if (can_dropped_invalid_skb(ndev, skb))
> >>> + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (priv->tx_obj == (PCH_OBJ_NUM + 1)) { /* Point tail Obj + 1 */
> >>> + while (ioread32(&priv->regs->treq2) & 0xfc00)
> >>> + udelay(1);
> >>
> >> please no (possible) infinite delays!
> >
> > I will add break processing.
> >
> >>
> >>> + priv->tx_obj = PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM + 1; /* Point head of Tx Obj ID */
> >>> + }
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + tx_buffer_avail = priv->tx_obj;
> >>
> >> why has the "object" become a "buffer" now? :)
> >
> > You are right.
> > I will modify the name.
> >
> >>
> >>> + priv->tx_obj++;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Attaining the lock. */
> >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Setting the CMASK register to set value*/
> >> ^^^
> >>
> >> pleas add a whitespace
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> >>
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_SET, &priv->regs->if2_cmask);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* If ID extended is set. */
> >>> + if (cf->can_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG) {
> >>> + iowrite32(cf->can_id & 0xffff, &priv->regs->if2_id1);
> >>> + iowrite32(((cf->can_id >> 16) & 0x1fff) | CAN_ID2_XTD,
> >>> + &priv->regs->if2_id2);
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + iowrite32(0, &priv->regs->if2_id1);
> >>> + iowrite32((cf->can_id & CAN_SFF_MASK) << 2,
> >>> + &priv->regs->if2_id2);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if2_id2, CAN_ID_MSGVAL);
> >>
> >> Do you need to do a read-modify-write of the hardware register? Please
> >> prepare the values you want to write to hardware, then do it.
> >
> > Current design policy for read/write message object,
> > the driver is designed with Read-Modify-Write.
> >
> > I will modify to Write only for reducing accessing Message RAM.
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + /* If remote frame has to be transmitted.. */
> >>> + if (!(cf->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG))
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if2_id2, CAN_ID2_DIR);
> >> dito
> >>> + /* If remote frame has to be transmitted.. */
> >>> + if (cf->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG)
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if2_id2, CAN_ID2_DIR);
> >> dito
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Copy data to register */
> >>> + if (cf->can_dlc > 0) {
> >>> + u32 data1 = *((u16 *)&cf->data[0]);
> >>> + iowrite32(data1, &priv->regs->if2_dataa1);
> >>
> >> do you think you send the bytes in correct order?
> >
> > Let me study this endianess.
> >
> >>
> >>> + }
> >>> + if (cf->can_dlc > 2) {
> >>> + u32 data1 = *((u16 *)&cf->data[2]);
> >>> + iowrite32(data1, &priv->regs->if2_dataa2);
> >>> + }
> >>> + if (cf->can_dlc > 4) {
> >>> + u32 data1 = *((u16 *)&cf->data[4]);
> >>> + iowrite32(data1, &priv->regs->if2_datab1);
> >>> + }
> >>> + if (cf->can_dlc > 6) {
> >>> + u32 data1 = *((u16 *)&cf->data[6]);
> >>> + iowrite32(data1, &priv->regs->if2_datab2);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + can_put_echo_skb(skb, ndev, tx_buffer_avail - PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM - 1);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Set the size of the data. */
> >>> + iowrite32(cf->can_dlc, &priv->regs->if2_mcont);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Update if2_mcont */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if2_mcont,
> >>> + CAN_IF_MCONT_NEWDAT | CAN_IF_MCONT_TXRQXT |
> >>> + CAN_IF_MCONT_TXIE);
> >>
> >> pleae first perpare your value, then write to hardware.
> >
> > ditto.
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + if (tx_buffer_avail == PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM) /* If points tail of FIFO */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if2_mcont, CAN_IF_MCONT_EOB);
> >>
> >> dito
> >>
> >> Is EOB relevant for TX objects?
> >
> > This is mistake. No meaning for tx.
> > I will modify.
> >
> >>
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if2_creq, tx_buffer_avail);
> >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> +
> >>> + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static const struct net_device_ops pch_can_netdev_ops = {
> >>> + .ndo_open = pch_can_open,
> >>> + .ndo_stop = pch_close,
> >>> + .ndo_start_xmit = pch_xmit,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static void __devexit pch_can_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct net_device *ndev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> +
> >>> + unregister_candev(priv->ndev);
> >>> + pci_iounmap(pdev, priv->regs);
> >>> + if (priv->use_msi)
> >>> + pci_disable_msi(priv->dev);
> >>> + pci_release_regions(pdev);
> >>> + pci_disable_device(pdev);
> >>> + pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> >>> + free_candev(priv->ndev);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> >>> +static void pch_can_set_int_custom(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + /* Clearing the IE, SIE and EIE bits of Can control register. */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->cont, CAN_CTRL_IE_SIE_EIE);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Appropriately setting them. */
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->cont,
> >>> + ((priv->int_enables & MSK_CTRL_IE_SIE_EIE) << 1));
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/* This function retrieves interrupt enabled for the CAN device. */
> >>> +static u32 pch_can_get_int_enables(struct pch_can_priv *priv)
> >>> +{
> >>> + /* Obtaining the status of IE, SIE and EIE interrupt bits. */
> >>> + return (ioread32(&priv->regs->cont) & CAN_CTRL_IE_SIE_EIE) >> 1;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static u32 pch_can_get_rx_enable(struct pch_can_priv *priv, u32 buff_num)
> >>> +{
> >>> + unsigned long flags;
> >>> + u32 enable;
> >>> +
> >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET, &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, buff_num);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (((ioread32(&priv->regs->if1_id2)) & CAN_ID_MSGVAL) &&
> >>> + ((ioread32(&priv->regs->if1_mcont)) &
> >>> + CAN_IF_MCONT_RXIE))
> >>> + enable = 1;
> >>> + else
> >>> + enable = 0;
> >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + return enable;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static u32 pch_can_get_tx_enable(struct pch_can_priv *priv, u32 buff_num)
> >>> +{
> >>> + unsigned long flags;
> >>> + u32 enable;
> >>> +
> >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> +
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET, &priv->regs->if2_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if2_creq, buff_num);
> >>> + if (((ioread32(&priv->regs->if2_id2)) & CAN_ID_MSGVAL) &&
> >>> + ((ioread32(&priv->regs->if2_mcont)) &
> >>> + CAN_IF_MCONT_TXIE)) {
> >>> + enable = 1;
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + enable = 0;
> >>> + }
> >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> +
> >>> + return enable;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void pch_can_set_rx_buffer_link(struct pch_can_priv *priv,
> >>> + u32 buffer_num, u32 set)
> >>> +{
> >>> + unsigned long flags;
> >>> +
> >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET, &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, buffer_num);
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RDWR | CAN_CMASK_CTRL, &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> + if (set == 1)
> >>> + pch_can_bit_clear(&priv->regs->if1_mcont, CAN_IF_MCONT_EOB);
> >>> + else
> >>> + pch_can_bit_set(&priv->regs->if1_mcont, CAN_IF_MCONT_EOB);
> >>> +
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, buffer_num);
> >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static u32 pch_can_get_rx_buffer_link(struct pch_can_priv *priv, u32 buffer_num)
> >>> +{
> >>> + unsigned long flags;
> >>> + u32 link;
> >>> +
> >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + iowrite32(CAN_CMASK_RX_TX_GET, &priv->regs->if1_cmask);
> >>> + pch_can_check_if_busy(&priv->regs->if1_creq, buffer_num);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (ioread32(&priv->regs->if1_mcont) & CAN_IF_MCONT_EOB)
> >>> + link = 0;
> >>> + else
> >>> + link = 1;
> >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->msgif_reg_lock, flags);
> >>> + return link;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int pch_can_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int i;
> >>> + int retval;
> >>> + u32 buf_stat; /* Variable for reading the transmit buffer status. */
> >>> + u32 counter = COUNTER_LIMIT;
> >>> +
> >>> + struct net_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Stop the CAN controller */
> >>> + pch_can_set_run_mode(priv, PCH_CAN_STOP);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Indicate that we are aboutto/in suspend */
> >>> + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_STOPPED;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Waiting for all transmission to complete. */
> >>> + while (counter) {
> >>> + buf_stat = pch_can_get_buffer_status(priv);
> >>> + if (!buf_stat)
> >>> + break;
> >>> + counter--;
> >>> + udelay(1);
> >>> + }
> >>> + if (!counter)
> >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s -> Transmission time out.\n", __func__);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Save interrupt configuration and then disable them */
> >>> + priv->int_enables = pch_can_get_int_enables(priv);
> >>> + pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_DISABLE);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Save Tx buffer enable state */
> >>> + for (i = PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM + 1; i <= PCH_OBJ_NUM; i++)
> >>> + priv->tx_enable[i] = pch_can_get_tx_enable(priv, i);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Disable all Transmit buffers */
> >>> + pch_can_tx_disable_all(priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Save Rx buffer enable state */
> >>> + for (i = 1; i <= PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM; i++) {
> >>> + priv->rx_enable[i] = pch_can_get_rx_enable(priv, i);
> >>> + priv->rx_link[i] = pch_can_get_rx_buffer_link(priv, i);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Disable all Receive buffers */
> >>> + pch_can_rx_disable_all(priv);
> >>> + retval = pci_save_state(pdev);
> >>> + if (retval) {
> >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pci_save_state failed.\n");
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + pci_enable_wake(pdev, PCI_D3hot, 0);
> >>> + pci_disable_device(pdev);
> >>> + pci_set_power_state(pdev, pci_choose_state(pdev, state));
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return retval;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int pch_can_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int i;
> >>> + int retval;
> >>> + struct net_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> >>> +
> >>> + pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0);
> >>> + pci_restore_state(pdev);
> >>> + retval = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> >>> + if (retval) {
> >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pci_enable_device failed.\n");
> >>> + return retval;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + pci_enable_wake(pdev, PCI_D3hot, 0);
> >>> +
> >>> + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Disabling all interrupts. */
> >>> + pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_DISABLE);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Setting the CAN device in Stop Mode. */
> >>> + pch_can_set_run_mode(priv, PCH_CAN_STOP);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Configuring the transmit and receive buffers. */
> >>> + pch_can_config_rx_tx_buffers(priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Restore the CAN state */
> >>> + pch_set_bittiming(dev);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Listen/Active */
> >>> + pch_can_set_optmode(priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Enabling the transmit buffer. */
> >>> + for (i = 1; i <= PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM; i++)
> >>> + pch_can_set_tx_enable(priv, i, priv->tx_enable[i]);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Configuring the receive buffer and enabling them. */
> >>> + for (i = PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM + 1; i <= PCH_OBJ_NUM; i++) {
> >>> + /* Restore buffer link */
> >>> + pch_can_set_rx_buffer_link(priv, i, priv->rx_link[i]);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Restore buffer enables */
> >>> + pch_can_set_rx_enable(priv, i, priv->rx_enable[i]);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Enable CAN Interrupts */
> >>> + pch_can_set_int_custom(priv);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Restore Run Mode */
> >>> + pch_can_set_run_mode(priv, PCH_CAN_RUN);
> >>> +
> >>> + return retval;
> >>> +}
> >>> +#else
> >>> +#define pch_can_suspend NULL
> >>> +#define pch_can_resume NULL
> >>> +#endif
> >>> +
> >>> +static int pch_can_get_berr_counter(const struct net_device *dev,
> >>> + struct can_berr_counter *bec)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> >>> +
> >>> + bec->txerr = ioread32(&priv->regs->errc) & CAN_TEC;
> >>> + bec->rxerr = (ioread32(&priv->regs->errc) & CAN_REC) >> 8;
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int __devinit pch_can_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >>> + const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct net_device *ndev;
> >>> + struct pch_can_priv *priv;
> >>> + int rc;
> >>> + void __iomem *addr;
> >>> +
> >>> + rc = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> >>> + if (rc) {
> >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed pci_enable_device %d\n", rc);
> >>> + goto probe_exit_endev;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + rc = pci_request_regions(pdev, KBUILD_MODNAME);
> >>> + if (rc) {
> >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed pci_request_regions %d\n", rc);
> >>> + goto probe_exit_pcireq;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + addr = pci_iomap(pdev, 1, 0);
> >>> + if (!addr) {
> >>> + rc = -EIO;
> >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed pci_iomap\n");
> >>> + goto probe_exit_ipmap;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + ndev = alloc_candev(sizeof(struct pch_can_priv), PCH_TX_OBJ_NUM);
> >>> + if (!ndev) {
> >>> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed alloc_candev\n");
> >>> + goto probe_exit_alloc_candev;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >>> + priv->ndev = ndev;
> >>> + priv->regs = addr;
> >>> + priv->dev = pdev;
> >>> + priv->can.bittiming_const = &pch_can_bittiming_const;
> >>> + priv->can.do_set_mode = pch_can_do_set_mode;
> >>> + priv->can.do_get_berr_counter = pch_can_get_berr_counter;
> >>> + priv->can.ctrlmode_supported = CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY |
> >>> + CAN_CTRLMODE_LOOPBACK;
> >>> + priv->tx_obj = PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM + 1; /* Point head of Tx Obj */
> >>> +
> >>> + ndev->irq = pdev->irq;
> >>> + ndev->flags |= IFF_ECHO;
> >>> +
> >>> + pci_set_drvdata(pdev, ndev);
> >>> + SET_NETDEV_DEV(ndev, &pdev->dev);
> >>> + ndev->netdev_ops = &pch_can_netdev_ops;
> >>> + priv->can.clock.freq = PCH_CAN_CLK; /* Hz */
> >>> +
> >>> + netif_napi_add(ndev, &priv->napi, pch_can_rx_poll, PCH_RX_OBJ_NUM);
> >>> +
> >>> + rc = pci_enable_msi(priv->dev);
> >>> + if (rc) {
> >>> + dev_info(&ndev->dev, "PCH CAN opened without MSI\n");
> >>> + priv->use_msi = 0;
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + dev_info(&ndev->dev, "PCH CAN opened with MSI\n");
> >>> + priv->use_msi = 1;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + rc = register_candev(ndev);
> >>> + if (rc) {
> >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed register_candev %d\n", rc);
> >>> + goto probe_exit_reg_candev;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +
> >>> +probe_exit_reg_candev:
> >>> + free_candev(ndev);
> >>> +probe_exit_alloc_candev:
> >>> + pci_iounmap(pdev, addr);
> >>> +probe_exit_ipmap:
> >>> + pci_release_regions(pdev);
> >>> +probe_exit_pcireq:
> >>> + pci_disable_device(pdev);
> >>> +probe_exit_endev:
> >>> + return rc;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static struct pci_driver pch_can_pcidev = {
> >>> + .name = "pch_can",
> >>> + .id_table = pch_pci_tbl,
> >>> + .probe = pch_can_probe,
> >>> + .remove = __devexit_p(pch_can_remove),
> >>> + .suspend = pch_can_suspend,
> >>> + .resume = pch_can_resume,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static int __init pch_can_pci_init(void)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return pci_register_driver(&pch_can_pcidev);
> >>> +}
> >>> +module_init(pch_can_pci_init);
> >>> +
> >>> +static void __exit pch_can_pci_exit(void)
> >>> +{
> >>> + pci_unregister_driver(&pch_can_pcidev);
> >>> +}
> >>> +module_exit(pch_can_pci_exit);
> >>> +
> >>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel EG20T PCH CAN(Controller Area Network) Driver");
> >>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> >>> +MODULE_VERSION("0.94");
> >>
> >> cheers, Marc
> >>
> >> --
> >> Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
> >> Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
> >> Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
> >> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Thanks, Tomoya(OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.)
>
> cheers, Marc
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
> Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists