[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289311573.18992.1.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:06:12 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@...x.dk>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Loopback performance from kernel 2.6.12 to 2.6.37
Le mardi 09 novembre 2010 à 14:59 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer a
écrit :
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 16:06 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> ...
> > > > > > I noticed that the loopback performance has gotten quite bad:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2612_2637&num=6
> > >
>
> > CC netdev, if you dont mind.
>
> No problem :-)
>
> > Their network test is basically :
> >
> > netcat -l 9999 >/dev/null &
> > time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=10000 | netcat 127.0.0.1 9999
>
> Should it not be:
> netcat -l -p 9999 >/dev/null &
>
It depends on netcat version. On yours, yes, you need the "-p"
> When I run the commands "dd | netcat", netcat never finish/exits, I have
> to press Ctrl-C to stop it. What am I doing wrong? Any tricks?
>
> "dd" reports 17.54 sec, and but the "time" measurement cannot be uses as
> the netcat just hangs/waits for more data...
>
Your netcat version needs a "-c" switch
time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=10000 | netcat -c 127.0.0.1 9999
> time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=10000 | netcat 127.0.0.1 9999
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 17,5419 s, 598 MB/s
>
> When I run the commands, I see 261682 context switches per sec...
>
> This quick test were on a Core i7 920 using kernel
> 2.6.32-rc3-net-next-dev-mp2t.
>
32 or 64bit kernel ?
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists