netdev - Re: [PATCH 01/11] vxge: enable rxhash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:38:06 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jon.mason@...r.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sivakumar.Subramani@...r.com,
	Sreenivasa.Honnur@...r.com, Ramkrishna.Vepa@...r.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] vxge: enable rxhash

From: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...r.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 16:53:40 -0600

> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:44:52PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> 
>> This patch set doesn't apply at all to the current tree, please
>> respin them, thanks.
> 
> When I sent out the series on Thursday, the tree did not have
> "vxge: make functions local and remove dead code".  When that patch
> was originally released (Oct 15), I asked for it to not be included as
> it would break soon-to-be-released patch series.  I did not see any
> e-mail afterward, so I assumed this was acceptable to you.  We then
> ran the driver though our internal tests to verify its functionality,
> which would need to be re-done if the patches are respun.
> 
> I have a reworked version of that patch which can be applied after
> this patch series.  Is it acceptable to you to revert the commit,
> apply the series, then apply the modified version of the "local
> functions" patch?  I have already sniff tested it on our hardware
> without issues.

Ummm, no.  I'm not reverting a correct patch just so that your
original patches apply properly.

Please just respin the patch series on top of the current tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html