[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289424343.2249.28.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:25:43 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent reading uninitialized memory with socketfilters
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 12:59 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:57:44 +0000
>
> > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 10:39 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > [...]
> >> In this patch, I use a bitmap (a single long var) so that only filters
> >> using mem[] loads/stores pay the price of added security checks.
> >>
> >> For other filters, additional cost is a single instruction.
> >>
> >> [ Since we access fentry->k a lot now, cache it in a local variable
> >> and mark filter entry pointer as const. -DaveM ]
> > [...]
> >
> > I don't see the justification for combining these changes. One patch,
> > one fix, right?
>
> I'm minimizing the performance impact of the new bitmap checks.
This seems like an entirely separate optimisation, since fentry->k was
*already* being used all over the place. (And a smart compiler should
optimise that anyway... though I realise gcc is often not that smart.)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists