netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/10] Fix leaking of kernel heap addresses in net/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1289525049.5167.82.camel@dan>
Date:	Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:24:09 -0500
From:	Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...radead.org>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	Urs Thuermann <urs.thuermann@...kswagen.de>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Remi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com>,
	"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...atatu.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/10] Fix leaking of kernel heap addresses in net/


> 
> If we really have to do this. At least don't duplicate all this code. Do
> the check in the printf argument:
> 
> 	seq_printf(seq, "%4d: %08X:%04X %08X:%04X"
> 		...
> 		capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN) ? sp : 0,
> 
> I would even move the decision whether to expose kernel addresses or not
> to a function so we can change behavior in one place.

I wrote it this way because the format specifier must also be changed,
or the %p output will print "(null)", which cannot be parsed by
userspace programs expecting "(nil)" or 0.  I could include another
check inside the format specifier, but that seemed pretty ugly.  But
then again, it's ugly either way.

-Dan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html