[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289840289.2607.92.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:58:09 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net
tree related)
Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 08:52 -0800, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:46:51 +1100
>
> > Caused by commit 1d7138de878d1d4210727c1200193e69596f93b3 ("igmp: RCU
> > conversion of in_dev->mc_list"). The for_each_pmc_rtnl and
> > for_each_pmc_rcu definitions are protected by CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST, but
> > the uses are not ...
>
> Thanks for the report, I've pushed the following fix:
>
> --------------------
> ipv4: Fix build with multicast disabled.
>
> net/ipv4/igmp.c: In function 'ip_mc_inc_group':
> net/ipv4/igmp.c:1228: error: implicit declaration of function 'for_each_pmc_rtnl'
> net/ipv4/igmp.c:1228: error: expected ';' before '{' token
> net/ipv4/igmp.c: In function 'ip_mc_unmap':
> net/ipv4/igmp.c:1333: error: expected ';' before 'igmp_group_dropped'
> ...
>
> Move for_each_pmc_rcu and for_each_pmc_rtnl macro definitions
> outside of multicast ifdef protection.
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> ---
>
Oops thats right, sorry David, I missed this message.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists