netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] e1000/e1000e/igb MDI-X control implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1290039253.30433.85.camel@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:14:13 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] e1000/e1000e/igb MDI-X control implementation

On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 15:29 -0800, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> this patch series is RFC for implemenation, I've briefly tested
> it to make sure I still get link after setting MDI-X and I see
> the status change in ethtool.
> 
> The basic idea is to fill out the MDI-X read functionality with
> some write functionality.
> 
> the e1000e patch is actually what drove this change as some users
> have found wonky switches that must have MDI/MDI-X forced.
[...]

I object to all these for the reasons explained in my comments on the
changes to the ethtool utility.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html