[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101118.094216.48502770.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:42:16 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: john.r.fastabend@...el.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-2.6 PATCH v2] net: zero kobject in rx_queue_release
From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:01:02 -0800
> net-next has Tom's changes for queue allocation and freeing. So the
> net-2.6 patch and net-next-2.6 patches are slightly different. I
> wanted to get the RCU_INIT_POINTER update in both and thought it
> would be easiest for Dave if they applied cleanly on both
> tree's. Let me know if there is a better way to indicate that here I
> just used the prefix net and net-next.
Right, applied, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists