netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101119.131443.35039425.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:14:43 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current
 tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:17:06 +1100

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c between commit
> 3006bc38895895f1a0352c2e17e1a503f35f7e2f ("bonding: fix a race in IGMP
> handling") from the net-current tree and commit
> 866f3b25a2eb60d7529c227a0ecd80c3aba443fd ("bonding: IGMP handling
> cleanup") from the net tree.
> 
> I just assumed that the latter is a better solution and used that.

Yep, that's correct, and I'm doing the same as I merge things myself
right now.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html