[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=8G7pNA7QTxaXDWKrWrCERPfmKU+nLJWCA=JUH@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:39:26 -0500
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.37-rc2-git4: Reported regressions 2.6.35 -> 2.6.36
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com> wrote:
> On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced
>> before
>> 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking
>> team.
>> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
>>
>> If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.35 regressions, please let us
>> know
>> either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any
>> of the entries below are invalid.
>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21652
>> Subject : several problems with intel graphics since 2.6.36
>> Submitter : Norbert Preining<preining@...ic.at>
>> Date : 2010-10-27 14:32 (23 days old)
>> Message-ID :<20101027143252.GA8676@...ma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128818998630241&w=2
>
> That one is interesting to me.. I suspect it may be the same cause
> as for https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21952
>
> I have one of those Samsung (N210) Netbooks here: works fine with 2.6.34 and
> earlier,
> but fails to come out of suspend on 2.6.35/2.6.36 (haven't tried 2.6.37).
>
> So perhaps add 21952 to the list, or link it to the 21652
> (kind of amusing how similar the bug numbers are..).
>
>
> My non-Intel graphics notebook (has ATI X1400 graphics) also has a resume
> regression with 2.6.36. But it does work fine with 2.6.35 (and earlier,
> back many years). As a result, I'm stuck with 2.6.35 for the time being,
> and lack the time for a concerted debug effort on 2.6.36+ right now.
>
Can you bisect? Does this patch help?
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
index 8e421f6..05efb5b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct
atom_context *ctx, int base,
base += 3;
break;
case ATOM_IIO_WRITE:
+ (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
ctx->card->ioreg_write(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1), temp);
base += 3;
break;
Alex
> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists