[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101122203155.27534f3b@nehalam>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:31:55 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>,
linux-x25@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x25: Move to staging
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 03:55:28 +0000
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:
> Recent review has revealed several bugs in obscure protocol
> implementations that can be exploited by local users for denial of
> service or privilege escalation.
>
> The x25 protocol (PF_X25) receives only 'odd fixes'. There appear to
> be no published applications for it, and it has never progressed
> beyond 'experimental' status.
>
> This protocol generally should not be enabled by distributions, since
> the cost of a security flaw affecting all installed systems presumably
> outweighs the benefit to the few (if any) legitimate users.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
> ---
> I'm somewhat less sure about this one; maybe it's improving? But there
> is little enough sign of any usefulness after 10 years.
>
> There are several X25 dependencies that presumably should be moved too.
No. If you don't like it then don't enable it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists