[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101124.114753.242145402.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:47:53 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mzhang@...sta.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: possible kernel oops from user MSS
From: Min Zhang <mzhang@...sta.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:59:58 -0800
> Regarding commit 7a1abd08d52fdeddb3e9a5a33f2f15cc6a5674d2 ("tcp:
> Increase TCP_MAXSEG socket option minimum"). What is the reason
> TCP_MAXSEG minimum be 64? Isn't the exact be 40 which is
> TCPOLEN_MD5SIG_ALIGNED(20) + TCPOLEN_TSTAMP_ALIGNED(12) + 8?
>
> Or is it better to use TCP_MIN_MSS from tcp.h:
>
> /* Minimal accepted MSS. It is (60+60+8) - (20+20). */
> #define TCP_MIN_MSS 88U
Committed to net-2.6:
--------------------
>From c39508d6f118308355468314ff414644115a07f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:47:22 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] tcp: Make TCP_MAXSEG minimum more correct.
Use TCP_MIN_MSS instead of constant 64.
Reported-by: Min Zhang <mzhang@...sta.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 0814199..f15c36a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2246,7 +2246,7 @@ static int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
/* Values greater than interface MTU won't take effect. However
* at the point when this call is done we typically don't yet
* know which interface is going to be used */
- if (val < 64 || val > MAX_TCP_WINDOW) {
+ if (val < TCP_MIN_MSS || val > MAX_TCP_WINDOW) {
err = -EINVAL;
break;
}
--
1.7.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists