[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CEEE0BB.6020509@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 23:18:35 +0100
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Ben Gamari <bgamari@...il.com>
CC: Mike Caoco <caoco2002@...oo.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unplug ethernet cable, the route persists. Why?
Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:29:43 -0800 (PST), Mike Caoco <caoco2002@...oo.com> wrote:
>> So if you rely on NetworkManager or Connman or Quagga to remove the
>> route, the routing daemons will recompute the route table anyway. So
>> why cannot this be done in the kernel?
>
> This is policy. In the Linux world we generally strive to separate
> policy from mechanism, leaving the former to userspace. This allows
> (potentially complex) policy decisions to be made in user-space. The
> reason for this is two-fold: First, every line of kernel code introduces
> the potentially for a bug and error handling in the kernel is generally
> more complex than it is in user-space. Secondly, allowing user-space to
> handle policy allows users to do things with the kernel that kernel
> developers did not envision. This flexibility is one reason why the
> kernel is so suited for running on anything from your cell-phone to 4000
> processor big iron.
Secondly and a half, if you add a specific route you may really
mean it, and prefer not to send at all than use default.
Cheers,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists