[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290909743.3292.248.camel@localhost>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 02:02:23 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] econet: Move to staging; remove from defconfig
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 17:39 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 05:26:44PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
> > Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:21:35 -0800
> >
> > > And I need an ack from the networking maintainer to be able to accept
> > > this also.
> >
> > I'm not applying this, nor do I want anyone else to.
> >
> > If people think this protocol is not maintained adequately
> > right now, wait until you push it into staging.
> >
> > Furthermore, once Phil Blundell was made aware of security
> > holes in econet he fixed them within a few days. Which is
> > much better than I can say for some of the other protocols
> > and filesystems in the tree.
> >
> > Moving this into staging, is therefore not appropriate.
>
> Agreed.
>
> Ben, why are you trying to remove these protocols that people use and
> maintain? This is the third one that has been shot down recently...
Moving to staging is a step toward removal, but not removal itself. I
already stated the reasons I picked those three protocols; I'm not going
to push the issue if David disagrees.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists