[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291058487.3435.1391.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:21:27 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: John Haxby <john.haxby@...cle.com>
Cc: NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: inet_hash_connect: source port allocation
Le lundi 29 novembre 2010 à 20:07 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le lundi 29 novembre 2010 à 19:46 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> > Le lundi 29 novembre 2010 à 18:29 +0000, John Haxby a écrit :
> >
> > > Sorry, I think I phrased my question badly.
> > >
> > > inet_csk_get_port() starts its search for a free port with
> > >
> > > smallest_rover = rover = net_random() % remaining + low;
> > >
> > > whereas __inet_hash_connect() basically misses out that call to
> > > net_random() so you get a predictable port number.
> > >
> > > Is there any good reason why that is the case?
> > >
> >
> > It seems random select was done at bind() time only in commit
> > 6df716340da3a6f ([TCP/DCCP]: Randomize port selection)
> >
> > It probably should be done in autobind too.
> >
> >
>
> I'll test following patch :
Oh well, forget this, there is something about inet_sk_port_offset()
using secure_ipv4_port_ephemeral()
We want to avoid reusing same port too fast.
http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_TCPIPClientEphemeralPortsandClientServerApplicatio-2.htm
Port is predictable only for same destination, and if no other
connections are attempted by other threads.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists