[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101129060114.GC29904@auslistsprd01.us.dell.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:01:14 -0600
From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>
To: Dmitry Kravkov <dmitry@...adcom.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>, narendra_k@...l.com,
jordan_hargrave@...l.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: Add Nic partitioning mode (57712 devices)
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:09:37AM +0200, Dmitry Kravkov wrote:
> NIC partitioning is another flavor of multi function - having few
> PCI functions share the same physical port. Unlike the currently
> supported mode of multi-function which depends on the switch
> configuration and uses outer-VLAN, the NPAR mode is switch independent
> and uses the MAC addresses to distribute incoming packets to the different
> functions. This patch adds the specific HW setting of the NPAR mode
> and some distinctions between switch dependent (SD) and
> switch independent (SI) multi-function (MF) modes where the configuration
> is not the same.
Just as SR-IOV introduced sysfs pointers between VF and PF devices:
/sys/bus/pci/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:09.0/0000:05:00.0/virtfn0 -> ../0000:05:10.0/
/sys/bus/pci/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:09.0/0000:05:10.0/physfn -> ../0000:05:00.0/
I would like to see a similar relationship exposed in sysfs for NPAR
partitions and their respective ports. This will let biosdevname
accurately name NPAR devices according to the scheme:
pci<slot>#<port>_<virtual function>
just as it does for SR-IOV devices. Is there one parent partition
that the child partitions could point back to, or other way to group
all the partitions of a single port?
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist
Dell | Office of the CTO
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists