lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:49:55 +0100 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>, Nagendra Tomar <tomer_iisc@...oo.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] net-next: Fix __inet_inherit_port() to correctly increment bsockets and num_owners Le lundi 29 novembre 2010 à 12:39 +0000, Jarek Poplawski a écrit : > Probably I miss something, but since bsockets is increased by each > passive connection now, it seems it will trigger "hash table is full" > too early? > bsockets is the number of bound sockets. It must be increased for each passive connection, since they are bound :) The value of bsockets is used to speedup bind() syscall, if few sockets are bound. If not, no optimization takes place. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists