[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291097564.2725.15.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:12:44 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David McCullough <david_mccullough@...fee.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv6/sit.c: return unhandled skb to tunnel4_rcv
Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 15:32 +1000, David McCullough a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I found a problem using an IPv6 over IPv4 tunnel. When CONFIG_IPV6_SIT
> was enabled, the packets would be rejected as net/ipv6/sit.c was catching
> all IPPROTO_IPV6 packets and returning an ICMP port unreachable error.
>
> I think this patch fixes the problem cleanly. I believe the code in
> net/ipv4/tunnel4.c:tunnel4_rcv takes care of it properly if none of the
> handlers claim the skb.
>
> Patch is against 2.6.35, bit still applies to current.
>
> Cheers,
> Davidm
>
> Signed-off-by: David McCullough <david_mccullough@...fee.com>
>
> diff -u -r1.1.1.45 sit.c
> --- a/net/ipv6/sit.c 12 Aug 2010 00:16:26 -0000 1.1.1.45
> +++ b/net/ipv6/sit.c 30 Nov 2010 05:01:19 -0000
> @@ -575,8 +575,9 @@
> return 0;
> }
>
> - icmp_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_PORT_UNREACH, 0);
> + /* no tunnel matched, let upstream know, ipsec may handle it */
> rcu_read_unlock();
> + return 1;
> out:
> kfree_skb(skb);
> return 0;
>
Good catch !
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists