netdev - Re: multi bpf filter will impact performance?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101201.122312.229751364.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:23:12 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	hagen@...u.net, xiaosuo@...il.com, wirelesser@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multi bpf filter will impact performance?

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:48:57 +0100

> Le mercredi 01 décembre 2010 à 10:44 -0800, David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:24:53 +0100
>> 
>> > A third work in progress (from my side) is to add a check in
>> > sk_chk_filter() to remove the memvalid we added lately to protect the
>> > LOAD M(K).
>> 
>> I understand your idea, but the static checkers are still going to
>> complain.  So better add a huge comment in sk_run_filter() explaining
>> why the checker's complaint should be ignored :-)
> 
> Sure, here is the patch I plan to test ASAP

Looks good to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html