lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimynbhgo2dqFwKOc8NT9TXpkCtCJMvwkySEBORz@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:36:13 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Rui <wirelesser@...il.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multi bpf filter will impact performance?

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Rui <wirelesser@...il.com> wrote:
> one more question is
>
> if  RPS can spread the load into 4 separate cpus, how about the
> "packet_rcv(or tpacket_rcv)" ? will they run in parallel?
>

You mentioned RPS. But the current bpf doesn't have an instruction to
get the current CPU number. You can try this patch attached.

Maybe we can leverage the bpf and SO_REUSEPORT to direct the traffic
to the socket instance on the local CPU.

-- 
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)

View attachment "bpf_cpu.diff" of type "text/plain" (728 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ