netdev - Re: Bonding, GRO and tcp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101202063939.GA30021@verge.net.au>
Date:	Thu, 2 Dec 2010 15:39:41 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bonding, GRO and tcp_reordering

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 05:47:06AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 01 décembre 2010 à 13:34 +0900, Simon Horman a écrit :
> 
> > I was tweaking those values recently for some latency tuning
> > but I didn't think of them in relation to last night's tests.
> > 
> > In terms of my measurements, its just benchmarking at this stage.
> > So a trade-off between throughput and latency is acceptable, so long
> > as I remember to measure what it is.
> > 
> 
> I was thinking again this morning about GRO and bonding, and dont know
> if it actually works...
> 
> Is GRO on on individual eth0/eth1/eth2 you use, or on bonding device
> itself ?

All of the above. I can check different combinations if it helps.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html