[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101206.093312.71114491.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:33:12 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehea: add the correct LRO status at dev->features
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:57:26 -0200
> On 12/06/2010 02:48 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:39:42 -0200
>> leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
>>
>>> Currently ehea is not setting NETIF_F_LRO, and it is not providing
>>> a callback for get_flags on ethtool. This patch fixes it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao<leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> More importantly, ehea does not support set_flags to disable LRO.
> Correct, currently LRO is a module parameter. I have an item in my
> TODO list to implement set_flags, and thus, the LRO scheme.
>
> So, if you prefer I can send this patch with the future set_flags
> ones. But, for now, this patch allows the user to check when LRO is
> enabled. As it is today, it shows that LRO is disabled all the time.
>
> Anyway, you choose what is the best option.
Your options are: 1) send a set_flags patch now 2) rip LRO support
completely out of the ehea driver.
The feature is implemented improperly, and as such we have every right
to forcefully disable it or remove it until it is fixed to function
correctly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists