[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CFD6C2B.9020201@chelsio.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:05:15 -0800
From: Dimitris Michailidis <dm@...lsio.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Misuse of LRO, how widespread
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:15:42 -0800
> Dimitris Michailidis <dm@...lsio.com> wrote:
>
>> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> I inspected all drivers in net-next to see which drivers are using
>>> LRO and which ones are broken. Most concerning is that Chelsio
>>> and Solarflare drivers ignore ETH_FLAG_LRO.
>>>
>>> The ones that are using LRO but allow disabling it:
>>> qlcnic, netxen, mv643, s2io, myi10ge, bnx2x, ixgbe, vmxnet3
>>>
>>> One driver seems confused about LRO vs GRO:
>>> mlx4 - comments about LRO and depends on LRO but driver is using GRO
>>>
>>> Drivers with not using ethtool interface to disable LRO:
>>> pasemi_mac, sfc, ehea, cxgb3, cxgb4
>> cxgb4 uses GRO, not LRO.
>
> Ok. but cxgb3 still uses LRO (or it least calls it lro).
>
cxgb3 was the driver Herbert implemented GRO on I think, and he converted it
to GRO. It possibly has leftover LRO references as it was using LRO before.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists