[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101207181910.GA2643@auslistsprd01.us.dell.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:19:10 -0600
From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"K, Narendra" <Narendra_K@...l.com>,
"Hargrave, Jordan" <Jordan_Hargrave@...l.com>,
"Rose, Charles" <Charles_Rose@...l.com>,
Colin Watson <cjwatson@...ntu.com>
Subject: Re: biosdevname v0.3.2
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 06:16:22PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It appears that 'unknown slot' is treated as a specific slot and all
> devices with an unknown slot are given unique indices. Perhaps this
> doesn't matter in the end, since no name is generated when the slot is
> unknown.
Yes on all counts.
> However, the 2 NIC ports do have their own indices (specified with the
> dev_id attribute) and it should be possible to distinguish slots by
> PCI/PCIe topology even though the name given won't correspond to any
> markings on the motherboard.
Tell me more about the dev_id attribute. I'm happy to use it, but I
don't understand the rules around populating it.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist
Dell | Office of the CTO
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists