netdev - Re: [PATCH] Fix 2.6.34-rc1 regression in disable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101209082703.6e5519e7@nehalam>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:27:03 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Mahesh Kelkar <maheshkelkar@...il.com>,
	Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>,
	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 2.6.34-rc1 regression in  disable_ipv6 support

On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:28:10 -0500
Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com> wrote:

> On 12/08/2010 11:16 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Finding the real bug is beyond me right now, but fixing the regression
> > in disable_ipv6 is simple.  We can just delete ::1 when we bring down
> > the loopback interface, and it will be restored automatically when we
> > bring the loopback interface back up.
> 
> Hi Eric,
> 
> This would work as well, same check, different way.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index 23cc8e1..5d16a9d 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -2728,7 +2728,8 @@ static int addrconf_ifdown(struct net_device *dev, int how)
>  		   and not link-local, then retain it. */
>  		if (!how &&
>  		    (ifa->flags&IFA_F_PERMANENT) &&
> -		    !(ipv6_addr_type(&ifa->addr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL)) {
> +		    !(ipv6_addr_type(&ifa->addr) &
> +		      (IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL|IPV6_ADDR_LOOPBACK))) {
>  			list_move_tail(&ifa->if_list, &keep_list);
>  
>  			/* If not doing DAD on this address, just keep it. */

Checking the address type is incorrect. Any type of address can be applied to
loopback interface. If you look a couple lines there is a special case for
loopback which keeps the address.

> 		/* If just doing link down, and address is permanent
> 		   and not link-local, then retain it. */
> 		if (!how &&
> 		    (ifa->flags&IFA_F_PERMANENT) &&
> 		    !(ipv6_addr_type(&ifa->addr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL)) {
> 			list_move_tail(&ifa->if_list, &keep_list);
> 
> 			/* If not doing DAD on this address, just keep it. */
> 			if ((dev->flags&(IFF_NOARP|IFF_LOOPBACK)) ||
> 			    idev->cnf.accept_dad <= 0 ||
> 			    (ifa->flags & IFA_F_NODAD))

I think the problem is on coming back up, not on the down step.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html