[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinE1srqkpib0+8Q63XjnhRYEWaaDsX70tc_OeUm@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:00:55 +0000
From: Neil Jones <neiljay@...il.com>
To: Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rndis gadget: Inconsistent locking
> Does this help: <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/195562/>?
Yes cheers, warning gone and driver seems fine so far.
has this been accepted upstream ?
Neil
2010/12/8 Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>:
> On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:11:30 +0100, Neil Jones <neiljay@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Im getting another lockdep warning when using the RNDIS gadget:
>>
>> WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:98 ___local_bh_disable+0xc4/0xd0()
>> Modules linked in: g_ether
>>
>> Call trace:
>> [<40003bf8>] _show_stack+0x68/0x7c
>> [<40003c20>] _dump_stack+0x14/0x28
>> [<40013c3c>] _warn_slowpath_common+0x5c/0x7c
>> [<40013c74>] _warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x2c
>> [<4001b17c>] ___local_bh_disable+0xc0/0xd0
>> [<4001b1a0>] _local_bh_disable+0x14/0x28
>> [<402e57f8>] __raw_spin_lock_bh+0x18/0x54
>> [<40257f4c>] _dev_txq_stats_fold+0x7c/0x13c
>> [<402580c4>] _dev_get_stats+0xb8/0xc0
>> [<781d4e60>] _rndis_msg_parser+0x288/0xa04 [g_ether]
>> [<781d5600>] _rndis_command_complete+0x24/0x70 [g_ether]
>> [<401d66fc>] _dwc_otg_request_done+0xd8/0x220
>> [<401d928c>] _ep0_complete_request+0x3f4/0x578
>> [<401d95bc>] _handle_ep0+0x1ac/0x146c
>> [<401daf7c>] _dwc_otg_pcd_handle_in_ep_intr+0x1c0/0x8bc
>> [<401db8dc>] _dwc_otg_pcd_handle_intr+0x264/0x294
>> [<401d6288>] _dwc_otg_pcd_irq+0x10/0x30
>> [<40054cf4>] _handle_IRQ_event+0x4c/0x184
>> [<40057b4c>] _handle_level_irq+0xac/0x15c
>> [<4000b204>] _metag_soc_irq_demux+0xac/0xb4
>> [<40002dd4>] _do_IRQ+0x4c/0x78
>> [<40004000>] _trigger_handler+0x38/0xac
>> [<40000b18>] ___TBIBoingVec+0xc/0x10
>> [<40003588>] _cpu_idle+0x54/0x78
>>
>> no locks held by swapper/0.
>> ---[ end trace 77ac3cfee0ae5b25 ]---
>
> Known problem.
>
>> It looks like we are calling spin_lock_bh in the completion function
>> which is running in hard_irq, I think the driver should defer handling
>> this msg (and maybe all requests) to a workqueue?
>
> Does this help: <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/195562/>?
>
> --
> Best regards, _ _
> | Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
> | Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
> +----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists