netdev - Re: [PATCH] Document the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101210173556.GA6420@dezo.moloch.sk>
Date:	Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:35:56 +0100
From:	Martin Lucina <mato@...elna.sk>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@...bpm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document the kernel_recvmsg() function

rdunlap@...otime.net said:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:04:05 +0100 Martin Lucina wrote:
> 
> > [Updated and sent to the netdev mailing list, Eric thx for the pointer]
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > so, today we spent all day figuring out how the kernel_sendmsg() function
> 
>                                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Maybe you could document that one also??  Thanks.

Sorry, that was a typo. But yes, we'll get to kernel_sendmsg(), as soon as
we can actually test that properly...

In any case, kernel_recvmsg() appears to be the more evil of the two, since
it was not obvious at all that it modifies the pointers passed in to kvec.

-mato
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html