[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32030.1292272904@death>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:41:44 -0800
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6 2/3] bonding: Change active slave quietly when bond is down
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
>bond_change_active_slave() may be called when a slave is added, even
>if the bond has not been brought up yet. It may then attempt to send
>packets, and further it may use mcast_work which is uninitialised
>before the bond is brought up. Add the necessary checks for
>netif_running(bond->dev).
I wondered if it would be better to instead arrange for
bond_change_active_slave (and bond_select_active_slave, which calls it)
to not be called when the bond is down, but that would require quite a
bit of change to bond_enslave and bond_open.
-J
Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
>Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index ef370c9..3b16c34 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -1178,11 +1178,13 @@ void bond_change_active_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_active)
> bond_do_fail_over_mac(bond, new_active,
> old_active);
>
>- bond->send_grat_arp = bond->params.num_grat_arp;
>- bond_send_gratuitous_arp(bond);
>+ if (netif_running(bond->dev)) {
>+ bond->send_grat_arp = bond->params.num_grat_arp;
>+ bond_send_gratuitous_arp(bond);
>
>- bond->send_unsol_na = bond->params.num_unsol_na;
>- bond_send_unsolicited_na(bond);
>+ bond->send_unsol_na = bond->params.num_unsol_na;
>+ bond_send_unsolicited_na(bond);
>+ }
>
> write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
> read_unlock(&bond->lock);
>@@ -1196,8 +1198,9 @@ void bond_change_active_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_active)
>
> /* resend IGMP joins since active slave has changed or
> * all were sent on curr_active_slave */
>- if ((USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode) && new_active) ||
>- bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ROUNDROBIN) {
>+ if (((USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode) && new_active) ||
>+ bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ROUNDROBIN) &&
>+ netif_running(bond->dev)) {
> bond->igmp_retrans = bond->params.resend_igmp;
> queue_delayed_work(bond->wq, &bond->mcast_work, 0);
> }
>--
>1.7.3.2
>
>
>
>--
>Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
>Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
>They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists