netdev - [PATCH update 2] firewire: net: add carrier detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101213014602.6bc2727b@stein>
Date:	Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:46:02 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Stuge <peter@...ge.se>,
	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH update 2] firewire: net: add carrier detection

From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>

To make userland, e.g. NetworkManager work with firewire, we need to
detect whether cable is plugged or not.  Simple and correct way of doing
that is just counting number of peers.  No peers - no link and vice
versa.

(Stefan R.:  Drop ethtool_ops.get_link)

Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
---
Update 2:  Removed ethtool related hunks; dev->peer_count does not need
to be accessed within the spinlock as I first thought; reduced pointer
reference depth in fwnet_remove_peer.

Maxim, do you observe a remaining need for a get_link implementation?
I can't tell, I use rather minimal userland that doesn't care for link
status.

 drivers/firewire/net.c |   16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: b/drivers/firewire/net.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/firewire/net.c
+++ b/drivers/firewire/net.c
@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ struct fwnet_device {
 	/* Number of tx datagrams that have been queued but not yet acked */
 	int queued_datagrams;
 
+	int peer_count;
 	struct list_head peer_list;
 	struct fw_card *card;
 	struct net_device *netdev;
@@ -1465,6 +1466,10 @@ static int fwnet_add_peer(struct fwnet_d
 	list_add_tail(&peer->peer_link, &dev->peer_list);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->lock);
 
+	/* dev->peer_count acess is serialized by fwnet_device_mutex. */
+	if (++dev->peer_count > 1)
+		netif_carrier_on(dev->netdev);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1543,13 +1548,16 @@ static int fwnet_probe(struct device *_d
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void fwnet_remove_peer(struct fwnet_peer *peer)
+static void fwnet_remove_peer(struct fwnet_peer *peer, struct fwnet_device *dev)
 {
 	struct fwnet_partial_datagram *pd, *pd_next;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&peer->dev->lock);
+	if (--dev->peer_count == 1)
+		netif_carrier_off(dev->netdev);
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&dev->lock);
 	list_del(&peer->peer_link);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&peer->dev->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(pd, pd_next, &peer->pd_list, pd_link)
 		fwnet_pd_delete(pd);
@@ -1566,7 +1574,7 @@ static int fwnet_remove(struct device *_
 
 	mutex_lock(&fwnet_device_mutex);
 
-	fwnet_remove_peer(peer);
+	fwnet_remove_peer(peer, dev);
 
 	if (list_empty(&dev->peer_list)) {
 		net = dev->netdev;


-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- ==-- -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html