[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D0B3ED9.3010305@6wind.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:43:37 +0100
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: "Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>
CC: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
"Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
"Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
"Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: e1000: more than two seconds to get the flag RUNNING
Le 16.12.2010 17:44, Ronciak, John a écrit :
> I'm assuming when you say "get the flag RUNNING" you mean to get link. Is that right? Are you connected to a switch? It is entirely possible to wait 2 seconds to get link on a 1000Base-T (RJ45) link. By specification link can take as much as 4 seconds. Do you have spanning tree enabled on the switch? That could be delaying link as well.
Yes, I mean 'get the link'. I was connected to a switch, but no spanning tree.
>
> To check this connect it back to back to another system. With this old of an adapter you may need to connect the two systems with a cross-over cable.
I get the same issue.
Regards,
Nicolas
>
> Cheers,
> John
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nicolas Dichtel [mailto:nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 8:17 AM
>> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny,
>> Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P;
>> Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John
>> Cc: netdev
>> Subject: e1000: more than two seconds to get the flag RUNNING
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> maybe this problem has already been discussed, but I didn't find the
>> thread.
>> When I put an interface managed by the e1000 driver up, down and up
>> again, I must wait more than 2 seconds to get the flag running again.
>>
>> Here is the sequence:
>>
>> shelby:~# uname -a
>> Linux shelby 2.6.37-rc5+ #9 SMP Wed Dec 15 13:16:10 EST 2010 i686
>> GNU/Linux shelby:~# lsmod | grep e1000
>> e1000 76543 0
>> shelby:~# lspci | grep Gigabit
>> 01:09.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet
>> Controller (rev 02) shelby:~# cat check_link_state.sh #!/bin/bash
>>
>> sleep_time=$1
>> ip link set eth0 up
>> ip link set eth0 down
>> ip link set eth0 up
>> while [ $sleep_time -gt 0 ] ; do
>> date
>> #ip link show eth0
>> ifconfig eth0 | grep MULTICAST
>> sleep 1
>> echo ""
>> sleep_time=`expr $sleep_time - 1`
>> done
>> shelby:~# ifconfig eth0
>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:1b:b4:dc:88
>> inet addr:10.16.0.72 Bcast:10.16.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> inet6 addr: fe80::230:1bff:feb4:dc88/64 Scope:Link
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:22051 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:63 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:2480685 (2.3 MiB) TX bytes:5242 (5.1 KiB)
>>
>> shelby:~# ./check_link_state.sh 3
>> [83270.080175] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready Thu Dec 16
>> 12:45:56 EST 2010
>> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>>
>> Thu Dec 16 12:45:57 EST 2010
>> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 [83271.828371]
>> e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
>> [83271.835878] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
>>
>> Thu Dec 16 12:45:58 EST 2010
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>>
>> shelby:~#
>>
>> I get the same result with a 2.6.15, so it seems that the problem is
>> here since a long time.
>> Has anyone an input for this problem?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nicolas
--
Nicolas DICHTEL
6WIND
R&D Engineer
Tel: +33 1 39 30 92 10
Fax: +33 1 39 30 92 11
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
www.6wind.com
Join the Multicore Packet Processing Forum: www.multicorepacketprocessing.com
Ce courriel ainsi que toutes les pièces jointes, est uniquement destiné à son ou
ses destinataires. Il contient des informations confidentielles qui sont la
propriété de 6WIND. Toute révélation, distribution ou copie des informations
qu'il contient est strictement interdite. Si vous avez reçu ce message par
erreur, veuillez immédiatement le signaler à l'émetteur et détruire toutes les
données reçues.
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and contains information that is confidential and
proprietary to 6WIND. All unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender
by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists