netdev - Re: [PATCHv4] fragment locally generated tunnel-mode IPSec6 packets as needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101219010353.GA1387@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:03:53 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	dlstevens@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] fragment locally generated tunnel-mode IPSec6
	packets as needed

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 02:34:23PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:16:06 +0800
> 
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 01:42:42PM -0800, David L Stevens wrote:
> >> This patch modifies IPsec6 to fragment IPv6 packets that are
> >> locally generated as needed.
> >> 
> >> This version of the patch only fragments in tunnel mode, so that fragment
> >> headers will not be obscured by ESP in transport mode.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: David L Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> 
> So is the TAHI test regression caused by v3 fixed here in v4?

I think so since that was probably caused by the incorrect
fragmentation of transport-mode packets before encapsulation.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html