[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101220.131146.115941299.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:11:46 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tj@...nel.org
Cc: mchan@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] bnx2: remove cancel_work_sync() from
remove_one
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:52:29 +0100
> After looking through the code, I don't think this is necessarily
> correct. ->ndo_close() doesn't guarantee that the watchdog timer has
> finished running (the timer is deleted with del_timer() not
> del_timer_sync()). ie. the watchdog timer could still be running
> after ->ndo_close() and may schedule reset_task. If remove_one
> doesn't flush the task, it may still be running when remove_one() is
> called.
>
> David, am I missing something? Wouldn't it cleaner to guarantee that
> ->ndo_close() is called with the guarantee that the watchdog timer is
> not running anymore?
It would but we can't just make the change over to del_timer_sync()
otherwise we'd deadlock on netif_tx_lock().
But I think things might be OK as-is.
The timer is deleted by dev_deactivate_many() which resets the qdisc
to the no-op qdisc. Then it deletes the timer.
Any running timer will complete or see the no-op qdisc attached and
return immediately.
synchronize_rcu() is then executed which guarentees completion.
Since both the watchdog timer itself and the del_timer() call run
with netif_tx_lock() held, this makes sure the timer, once deleted,
will only see the no-op qdisc and return immediately if it is
amidst running, else it has already returned when the timer delete
completes.
So we might be OK here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists