[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B4EA6EF7414747D3B1331DC53D6C2E6A@hacdom.okisemi.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:58:51 +0900
From: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
To: "Wolfgang Grandegger" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"Dan Carpenter" <error27@...il.com>
Cc: <socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch -next] pch_can: off by one bugs
On Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:41 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> This fix does not look correct too me.
I agree with Wolfgang's comments.
> Dan
Thank you for your report.
I will post the patch by this week.
Thanks,
---
Tomoya MORINAGA
OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wolfgang Grandegger" <wg@...ndegger.com>
To: "Dan Carpenter" <error27@...il.com>
Cc: <socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de>; <netdev@...r.kernel.org>;
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>; "Tomoya MORINAGA"
<tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:41 AM
Subject: Re: [patch -next] pch_can: off by one bugs
> Hello,
>
> On 12/20/2010 10:26 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> priv->tx_enable[] has PCH_TX_OBJ_END elements so this code is
>> reading and writing one past the end of the array.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
>> index 8d45fdd..b2c1292 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
>> @@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ static int pch_can_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> pm_message_t state)
>> pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_DISABLE);
>>
>> /* Save Tx buffer enable state */
>> - for (i = PCH_TX_OBJ_START; i <= PCH_TX_OBJ_END; i++)
>> + for (i = PCH_TX_OBJ_START; i < PCH_TX_OBJ_END; i++)
>> priv->tx_enable[i] = pch_can_get_rxtx_ir(priv, i, PCH_TX_IFREG);
>>
>> /* Disable all Transmit buffers */
>> @@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ static int pch_can_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> pch_can_set_optmode(priv);
>>
>> /* Enabling the transmit buffer. */
>> - for (i = PCH_TX_OBJ_START; i <= PCH_TX_OBJ_END; i++)
>> + for (i = PCH_TX_OBJ_START; i < PCH_TX_OBJ_END; i++)
>> pch_can_set_rxtx(priv, i, priv->tx_enable[i], PCH_TX_IFREG);
>>
>> /* Configuring the receive buffer and enabling them. */
>>
>
> This fix does not look correct too me. There are much more loop using
> "i <= PCH_TX_OBJ_END" and the message numbering is from 1..32. Therefore
> using "priv->tx_enable[i - 1]" seems more appropriate to me. Tomaya,
> could you please check.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wolfgang.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists