netdev - Re: [PATCH V7 1/8] ntp: add ADJ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:58:10 +0300
From:	Alexander Gordeev <lasaine@....cs.msu.su>
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc:	"Kuwahara,T." <6vvetjsrt26xsrzlh1z0zn4d2grdah@...il.com>,
	Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...ux.it>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/8] ntp: add ADJ_SETOFFSET mode bit

В Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:59:44 -0800
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> пишет:

> On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 06:13 +0900, Kuwahara,T. wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:37 AM, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > > adjtimex is a linux specific interface, which is compatible but not
> > > identical to the ntp specified interfaces. The ntp client code already
> > > has Linux specific modifications, so I don't think we have to worry
> > > about 0x40 specifically being reserved by the NTP client.
> > 
> > But struct timex is not linux-specific...
> 
> It is if you're compiling against linux's timex.h file. 
> 
> We already have a number of differences compared with BSD's timex mode
> definitions:
> We have ADJ_TICK: 0x4000, which is MOD_CLKB in FreeBSD.
> We also have ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT and ADJ_OFFSET_SS_READ which allow
> adjtimex act like the original ntp_adjtime.
> 
> The key bit is that we map the shared MOD_* definitions that the NTP
> client uses to the linux specific ADJ_* values in the linux timex.h
> 
> However, your concern does bring up a good point: 0x40 is MOD_PPSMAX in
> BSD, and we should at-least check to make sure that the PPS code that is
> currently floating around on the lists and is in akpm's tree hasn't
> already reserved that bit.
> 
> Rodolfo, Alexander: Any comments here?

No, it is used neither in my patches nor in the original code. The only
change my patches do to timex.h is adding hardpps().

-- 
  Alexander

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)