lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:43:13 +0800
From:	Jason Wang <jason77.wang@...il.com>
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, steve.glendinning@...c.com,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] smsc911x: add disable and re-enable Rx int to de-assert interrupt pin

When kernel enters irqhanlder, it will check the Rx interrupt status
bit, if Rx status is set but can't call napi_schedule(), it will do
nothing and directly return form irqhandler. This situation is prone
to be produced when we repeatly call irqhandler through netpoll
interface(i.e kgdboe connecting).

This is a potential risk for those level triggered platforms(i.e
ti_omap3evm), because if we don't handle Rx int and just return from
irqhandler, the irq pin will be keeping asserted, the level triggered
platforms will have no chance to jump out from the Rx irq. The whole
system will hung into the irq subsystem.

To solve it, we add a disable/re-enable Rx int operation for this
situation, this operation can de-assert interrupt pin for this time
and will leave the received data and status in the FIFO for later
interrupts to handle.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jason77.wang@...il.com>
---
 drivers/net/smsc911x.c |   18 ++++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/smsc911x.c b/drivers/net/smsc911x.c
index 64bfdae..dd6312f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/smsc911x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/smsc911x.c
@@ -1492,14 +1492,20 @@ static irqreturn_t smsc911x_irqhandler(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	}
 
 	if (likely(intsts & inten & INT_STS_RSFL_)) {
-		if (likely(napi_schedule_prep(&pdata->napi))) {
-			/* Disable Rx interrupts */
-			temp = smsc911x_reg_read(pdata, INT_EN);
-			temp &= (~INT_EN_RSFL_EN_);
-			smsc911x_reg_write(pdata, INT_EN, temp);
+		/* Disable Rx interrupts first, if doesn't meet
+		 * napi_schedule_prep(), we will re-enable Rx interrupts. This
+		 * disable and re-enable pair operation can De-assert interrupt
+		 * line and is more safer to those level triggered platforms. */
+		temp = smsc911x_reg_read(pdata, INT_EN);
+		temp &= (~INT_EN_RSFL_EN_);
+		smsc911x_reg_write(pdata, INT_EN, temp);
+
+		if (likely(napi_schedule_prep(&pdata->napi)))
 			/* Schedule a NAPI poll */
 			__napi_schedule(&pdata->napi);
-		} else {
+		else {
+			temp |= INT_EN_RSFL_EN_;
+			smsc911x_reg_write(pdata, INT_EN, temp);
 			SMSC_WARNING(RX_ERR,
 				"napi_schedule_prep failed");
 		}
-- 
1.5.6.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ