netdev - Re: [PATCH] Export ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and string name to sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101223143203.GA12256@auslistsprd01.us.dell.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:32:03 -0600
From:	Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>
To:	Narendra_K@...l.com
Cc:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jordan_Hargrave@...l.com,
	Charles_Rose@...l.com, Vijay_Nijhawan@...l.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and string name to sysfs

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 08:42:39AM -0800, Narendra_K@...l.com wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This patch exports ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and
> string name to sysfs.
> 
> Please review -

There are now two different meanings for the 'index' file:

1) SMBIOS-provided "type instance" value, which I've only seen in
   range [1..N] for N devices, monotonically stepwise increasing.

2) ACPI-provided "index" value, which per spec only needs to be a
   "sort key", not starting at 0 or 1, and while monotonically
   increasing, not necessarily stepwise.  It's perfectly valid for the
   values to be (12, 16, 27, 29) if that's convenient for BIOS to
   generate.

Therefore, a consumer of this value (such as biosdevname) must know
which of the two it's dealing with, and either accept the value as-is,
or sort the value list.  While I suppose it could sort the value list
in either case, I'd prefer the ACPI value to be exposed in its own
file, perhaps 'acpi_index', to make this explicit rather than
implicit.

'label' is fine for either case, with ACPI taking priority over
SMBIOS if both happen to be present.

Thanks,
Matt

-- 
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist
Dell | Office of the CTO
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html