| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1293080846.2679.41.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:07:26 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Alexey Vlasov <renton@...ton.name>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.36.2 - loop on read /proc/net/tcp
Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 16:43 +0300, Alexey Vlasov a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> Has anyone seen such a bug at 2.6.36.2?
> # netstat -ntl
> Active Internet connections (only servers)
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.2:60608 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:8099 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.5:8099 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.7:8099 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:8100 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.5:8100 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:8101 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.5:8101 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.5:20037 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:8102 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.5:8102 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:3399 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:20040 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:38985 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:873 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:20041 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:20042 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:3306 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.3:3306 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.2:3306 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.5:9099 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:9099 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:20043 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:139 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.5:9100 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:9100 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:20044 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.5:33549 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> ...
> First 30 lines are ok
>
> but then go lines repeating in "eternal" loop:
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.2:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.3:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.7:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.2:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.3:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.7:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.2:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.3:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.4:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.7:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> tcp 0 0 81.176.228.2:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>
> # cat /proc/net/tcp
> ...
> It can hang an hour or so. but not always actually.
>
> # i=0; while [ "$i" -lt "10" ]; do time wc -l /proc/net/tcp; let "i = $i + 1"; done
> 614782727 /proc/net/tcp
>
> real 18m42.066s
> user 0m12.620s
> sys 18m25.890s
> 19443 /proc/net/tcp
>
> real 0m0.040s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.030s
> 19503 /proc/net/tcp
>
> real 0m0.040s
> sys 0m0.030s
> 19502 /proc/net/tcp
>
> real 0m0.041s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.040s
> 28525 /proc/net/tcp
>
> real 0m0.059s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.050s
> 19463 /proc/net/tcp
>
> real 0m0.048s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.040s
> 19521 /proc/net/tcp
>
> real 0m0.040s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.030s
> 54394 /proc/net/tcp
>
> real 0m0.104s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.100s
> 19479 /proc/net/tcp
>
> real 0m0.040s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.030s
> 19481 /proc/net/tcp
>
> real 0m0.040s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.030s
>
Hi Alexey
Thanks a lot for your report.
Here is a fix.
(Incidentaly, this means accesses to 0x40000000 addresses dont trigger
faults, since we never BUG() at this point)
David, this is a stable candidate. (2.6.29 +)
Thanks !
[PATCH] tcp: fix listening_get_next()
Alexey Vlasov found /proc/net/tcp could sometime loop and display
millions of sockets in LISTEN state.
In 2.6.29, when we converted TCP hash tables to RCU, we left two
sk_next() calls in listening_get_next().
We must instead use sk_nulls_next() to properly detect an end of chain.
Reported-by: Alexey Vlasov <renton@...ton.name>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index e13da6d..d978bb2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -2030,7 +2030,7 @@ static void *listening_get_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *cur)
get_req:
req = icsk->icsk_accept_queue.listen_opt->syn_table[st->sbucket];
}
- sk = sk_next(st->syn_wait_sk);
+ sk = sk_nulls_next(st->syn_wait_sk);
st->state = TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING;
read_unlock_bh(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue.syn_wait_lock);
} else {
@@ -2039,7 +2039,7 @@ get_req:
if (reqsk_queue_len(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue))
goto start_req;
read_unlock_bh(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue.syn_wait_lock);
- sk = sk_next(sk);
+ sk = sk_nulls_next(sk);
}
get_sk:
sk_nulls_for_each_from(sk, node) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists